Skip to content

The Movies, Films and Flix Podcast – Episode 630 – Abigail (2024), Dan Stevens, and Onions

June 19, 2025

You can download or stream the pod on Apple Podcasts, Tune In, Podbean, or Spreaker (or wherever you listen to podcasts…..we’re almost everywhere).

If you get a chance please make sure to review, rate and share. You are awesome.

Mark and Zanandi discuss the 2024 horror comedy Abigail. Directed by Tyler Gillett and Matt Bettinelli-Olpin, and starring Melissa Barrera, Dan Stevens, Alisha Weir and a bag of onions, the movie focuses on what happens when a group of criminals have a really bad night. In this episode, they also talk about blood pools, Dan Stevens and the excellence of Kathryn Newton. Enjoy!

If you are a fan of the podcast, make sure to send in some random listener questions (we love random questions). We thank you for listening, and hope you enjoy the episode!

You can download the pod on Apple Podcasts, Tune In, Podbean, or Spreaker.

28 Years Later (2025) – Review

June 19, 2025

Quick Thoughts

  • I love it when Danny Boyle and Alex Garland embrace chaos
  • It’s filled with some of the most visceral and gnarly visuals of 2025
  • Jodie Comer, Aaron Taylor-Johnson, Ralph Fiennes, Jack O’Connell, and Alfie Williams understand the assignment
  • Don’t expect a tidy three-act experience. Like 28 Days Later, Sunshine, and Annihilation (which Garland directed), 28 Years Later has its own agenda. 
  • It’s intense
  • Top 10 of the year (so far)
  • 28 Weeks Later rules btw

 The best thing that can be said about 28 Years Later is that it’s unpredictable. The fact that it’s unpredictable shouldn’t be surprising considering director Danny Boyle and writer Alex Garland have always had chaotic streaks, but the unique plotting choices keep things off-kilter, which in turn makes things stressful because there’s no way to predict what’s coming next (most of the time it’s something terrible). Danny Boyle’s films have always been visually interesting and successful, however, while watching 28 Years Later I kept thinking “This guy is really cooking.” Boyle uses everything in his storied arsenal to create a visually-interesting and propulsive film that hits on all cylinders. Also, Garland and Boyle know that audiences have been watching “fast zombies” for 20+ years, so they evolved the pissed-off infected horde to make them more intelligent and industrious. 

This time, the pissed-off infected hordes are mostly substituted for “slow-low” infected who scour the forest floor looking for worms, and super-fast infected who are led by an Alpha reminiscent of Zeus from Army of the Dead. If you haven’t watched the Zack Snyder-directed Army of the Dead, the “Alphas” are physically imposing behemoths who have above-average intelligence and enough strength to easily rip skulls (and spines) from bodies. The evolved “zombies” make sense considering they’ve had 28 years to adapt to their surroundings, and the lack of viable food options has forced them to adapt other methods of feeding. 

The original rage-infected are still around as the film opens up with an attack the features child murder, mad sprints, and a young child watching his father becoming an infected maniac. It then moves to an idyllic island where the residents have managed to create a barrier between themselves and the infected mainland. They’re protected by a naturally made bridge that can only be crossed during low tides and any attempt to swim across the channel would result in drowning due to strong tides. After all the setup is out of the way, we’re introduced to a 12-year-old named Spike (Alfie Williams) who is contemplating whether he should bring his favorite action figure with him during his first journey to the mainlaind with his father Jamie (Aaron Taylor-Johnson). Spike decides to leave the toy on his bed stand, and it’s a nice way to showcase that despite his maturity, he’s still a toy-loving kid. 

Shortly after leaving the safety of the island things go sideways when Jamie and Spike come across an “Alpha” and his horde. While hiding out in an abandoned farmhouse, Spike notices a large fire and learns about a doctor named Ian Kelson (Ralph Fiennes) who lives on his own in the wilderness and has managed to avoid becoming a rage zombie This plants an idea in Spike’s head because he wants to get treatment for his sick mom Isla (Jodie Comer) – who suffers from headaches, memory loss and bloody noses. When the pair get back to the island, Spike hatches a plan and it wouldn’t be cool to spoil anything else. 

On the technical front, Danny Boyle’s longtime cinematographer Anthony Dod Mantle (who also shot Antichrist, Dredd, and Dogville) is able to recreate the 2002 aesthetic without making it seem like a more expensive recreation. The 2002 film was shot on a Canon XL1 miniDV camera, whereas the 2025 sequel used the iPhone 15 Pro Max (with a variety of cool attachments, cages, adapters and lenses). Between the low resolution (480p) and bumped-up gain settings, 28 Days Later has a grainy look that adds to the gorgeous lo-fi visuals. With the iPhones, Dod Mantle and Boyle were able to create startling visuals that make the picturesque British locations seem hellish. Also, the production design by Mark Tildesley (Sunshine, Phantom Thread, 28 Days Later) is top-notch and his creations (skull tower!) have been used all over the promotional materials (they are great). Overall, the technical aspects of the production are fantastic and you’re able to see every cent of the $75 million budget on-screen. 

Between Slumdog Millionaire, Millions, 28 Days Later, and now 28 Years Later, Boyle has always known how to get the best out of his kid actors, and he gets a wonderful performance out of Alfie Williams. It helps that he shares the screen with Jodie Comer, Ralph Fiennes and Aaron Taylor-Johnson, who all work their magic by creating lived-in characters and having solid chemistry with the 14-year old first-time actor. Also, between Killing Eve, The Bikeriders, and The Last Duel, it’s hard to not be in awe of Jodie Comer. She spends the first third of the film bedridden (and very sweaty), but when she gets moving she’s able to do a lot with her character. 

Movies like 28 Years Later are wonderful because they aren’t content with playing things safe. Boyle loads the film with inventive camerawork, unique narration and footage from old movies and actual events. Editor Jon Harris (Snatch, Layer Cake, 127 Hours) had his work cut out for him and he crafted an intense and intelligible final product that’s exciting and vibrant.

Final thoughts – Watch it on the biggest screen possible and enjoy the insanity.

The Movies, Films and Flix Podcast – Episode 629: The 2009 Action Scene Draft

June 15, 2025

You can download or stream the pod on Apple Podcasts, Tune In, Podbean, or Spreaker (or wherever you listen to podcasts…..we’re almost everywhere).

If you get a chance please make sure to review, rate and share. You are awesome.

Mark and Aaron Neuwirth (@AaronsPS4 on X) draft their favorite scenes from 2009 action movies. In this episode, they talk about the neat action scenes in Drag me to Hell, Avatar, Crank: High Voltage, Merantu, Fast & Furious, District 9, Inglourious Basterds, Black Dynamite, Thirst and Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen.

If you are a fan of the podcast, make sure to send in some random listener questions (we love random questions). We thank you for listening, and hope you enjoy the episode!

You can download the pod on Apple Podcasts, Tune In, Podbean, or Spreaker.

How to Train Your Dragon (2025) – Review

June 12, 2025

Quick Thoughts

Grade – C+

  • For better or worse, How to Train Your Dragon (2025) is a live-action remake that doesn’t stray too far from the original. 
  • Roger Deakins’ visual consultant work is missing (he worked on the three HTTYD animated films). Cinematographer Bill Pope does a fine job, but it’s pretty close to a shot-for-shot remake, which doesn’t allow Pope to do anything other than shoot a professional-looking film.
  • Mason Thames and Nico Parker are solid.
  • Aside from money, merchandising, theme park promotion, and licensing (and competing with Disney), I’m not sure why it exists.

I don’t mind remakes. They’ve always been around and won’t stop being produced because they are easy to finance and make decent money. When done right, remakes like Fright Night (2011), Let Me In (2010), The Crazies (2010), Dawn of the Dead (2004) and The Fly (1986), work as companion pieces that hit familiar beats and offer something new and fresh. However, for every standout, it seems like there are double the amount of remakes like Martyrs (2015), Inside (2016), Speak No Evil (2024) and Psycho (1998), that pull their punches and have zero reason to exist other than making money. In the case of How to Train Your Dragon, it’s somewhere in the middle. Director Dean Dublois is back, Gerald Butler is back, and a lot of money was spent making something serviceable. 

If you aren’t familiar with the How to Train Your Dragon world, it focuses on a teenage Viking named Hiccup (Mason Thames), who desperately wants to follow in the footsteps of his legendary dragon-killing father Stoick the Vast (Gerard Butler). They live on an island named Burk, which is home to a collection of wannabe dragon killers from all over the world. They spend their days rebuilding their village (after dragon attacks), protecting livestock (from dragons), and prepping for more attacks (from dragons). It’s an ugly cycle that is unwinnable for the stubborn denizens of the isolated island. Basically, Vikings don’t like dragons, Hiccup befriends a dragon, and things get crazy when Stoick decides to attack the home of the dragons – which doesn’t end well for his fleet of wooden ships. During all of this, there are training montages, chaotic flights, and a budding relationship between Hiccup and Astrid (Nico Parker), the town’s most promising dragon slayer. 

What’s nice about the remake is that it respects its source material. However, by appeasing diehard fans, DeBlois has made a boring film for people who have watched the animated movies. In an interview with The Wrap, DeBlois admitted that for “better or worse” he stuck close to the plot lines of the first film (which was adapted from a book) and he made the correct (AKA boring) decision. He clearly loves his characters, but by sticking to the playbook, he’s delivered a safe and borderline meaningless remake that he directed because he didn’t want anybody else to take the reins (makes sense). An interesting fact is that DeBlois was given full creative control and he decided to not gamble by keeping the story the same and expanding upon the world a little bit more. As a first-time live-action film director it’s smart that he kept things simple and safe, and the additions he made make sense. He’s given more backstory to Astrid, which allows Nico Parker to showcase her skills (she’ll be a big star soon). Also, Burk is no longer the exclusive home of burley Scandinavian Vikings, as it’s become home to people from all over the world who want to kill dragons.

The biggest problem with the movie is that there are no “whoa” or “holy moly” moments. The VFX is fine and the production design by Dominic Watkins feels lived-in, but the movie never soars. Being familiar with the animated films understandably makes things less surprising, but I’ve watched plenty of remakes that have caught my attention (For example, the opening attack in 2004’s Daw of the Dead). I distinctly remember holding my breath and feeling the wind during the first flying scene in the OG HTTYD. I never once felt any emotions during the flying scenes in the live-action film – which comes down to familiarity and the fact that they aren’t exciting. 

When the credits started rolling the remake was met with loud cheers and applause, so it seems like Dreamworks has a hit on their hands. From a business perspective, the producers made wise decisions, but It would’ve been nice if they made a film that was a little less familiar. Dreamworks must’ve learned from recent Disney live-action films and decided to avoid controversy, so they gave remake/rebootquel-loving audiences a faithful remake that won’t ruffle any feathers. It’s smart, but it’s quite cynical in a landscape of cynical money-making exercises. 

The Movies, Films and Flix Podcast – Episode 628: Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country (1991), Angry Kirk, and Gnarly Mind-Melds

June 11, 2025

You can download or stream the pod on Apple Podcasts, Tune In, Podbean, or Spreaker (or wherever you listen to podcasts…..we’re almost everywhere).

If you get a chance please make sure to review, rate and share. You are awesome.

Mark and Niall discuss the 1991 sequel Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country. Directed by Nicholas Meyer, and starring William Shatner, Leonard Nimoy, Christopher Plummer and a gnarly mind-meld, the even-numbered sequel is easily one of the best Star Trek films.  In this episode, they also talk about angry Kirk, magnetic boots, and shapeshifters. Enjoy!

If you are a fan of the podcast, make sure to send in some random listener questions (we love random questions). We thank you for listening, and hope you enjoy the episode!

You can download the pod on Apple Podcasts, Tune In, Podbean, or Spreaker.

The Movies, Films and Flix Podcast – Episode 627: Andor, Star Wars and Tony Gilroy

June 7, 2025

You can download or stream the pod on Apple Podcasts, Tune In, Podbean, or Spreaker (or wherever you listen to podcasts…..we’re almost everywhere).

If you get a chance please make sure to review, rate and share. You are awesome.

Mark and DJ Valentine (@TryingToBeDJV on X) talk about their favorite moments from the second season of Andor. They also talk about Star Wars television, dance parties, and excellent eyebrow raising. Enjoy!

If you are a fan of the podcast, make sure to send in some random listener questions (we love random questions). We thank you for listening, and hope you enjoy the episode!

You can download the pod on Apple Podcasts, Tune In, Podbean, or Spreaker.

Bored? Feeling nice? Please write a review for the Movies, Films and Flix podcast. Thanks!

June 6, 2025

Hello! Mark here. I’ve never done this before, but I’m asking for help. If you have a few spare minutes it would be awesome if you wrote a review for the podcast. The reviews help improve our visibility and give potential listeners more reasons to check out the show. If you don’t feel like writing a review (it’s totally cool), please give us a rating on the platform where you listen to the show. Ratings help too!

Thank you! Have a nice day.

Mark

Here’s the new episode.

Wick is Pain (2025) – Review

June 5, 2025

Quick Thoughts 

Grade – B+

  • Wick is Pain is a well-deserved victory lap for everyone involved with the John Wick franchise. It’s entertaining, honest, and loaded with excellent information.
  • All filmmakers should study this doc to learn how to make a good lookbook
  • Keanu Reeves is a legend. 
  • I love a good “warts and all” documentary. 
  • It makes me happy that the first cut of John Wick (2014) resembled a dour Swedish noir. 

It’s easy to forget that the production of John Wick (2014) was fraught with budget limitations, production issues and two first-time directors who argued about everything. At one point, the production was in trouble of shutting down and it was saved by Eva Longoria who wrote a check for three million dollars to keep the production rolling. Also, in 2014, Hollywood legend Keanu Reeves had been on a years-long run of unsuccessful films like The Day the Earth Stood Still, Generation Um…, 47 Ronin, and Henry’s Run, which meant the $20-30 million budgeted film wasn’t guaranteed to be picked up by a major studio. Most people looked at John Wick as a straight-to-video action film – which is insane to think about now. It also didn’t help that co-directors Chad Stahleski and David Leitch, who were well-known stuntmen (who worked with Keanu on The Matrix films), wanted to prove that they could do dramatic stuff as well as kickass action. So, they loaded the first cut of John Wick with about 30 minutes of Wick moping around his house after the death of his wife, which gave the film a “Swedish noir movie” vibe that needed to be edited into something watchable. John Wick seemed destined to fail, however, Lionsgate Films believed in it, and 10 years later the four John Wick films have collected over a billion dollars worldwide and garnered excellent critical (89.5% Tomatometer average) and audience (7.47 IMDb Average) averages. Not bad for a franchise that introduced itself to the world by murdering an adorable puppy.

During the documentary, pretty much everyone involved from the stunt crew to the producers talks about how grueling the productions were – which is where the term “Wick is Pain” comes from. Here are some of the factors that led to so much pain.

  1. Director Chad Stahleski is a bit of a maniac and he pushed Keanu Reeves and his crew to extreme places to achieve greatness. 
  2. After each film wrapped, everyone on the crew never wanted to work on another John Wick film ever again. However, they always came back for the sequels.
  3. Keanu Reeves needed about 7,000 ice baths while filming the four movies. The guy is a machine and was sick for most of the 100-day shoot of John Wick: Chapter 4.
  4. Getting John Wick (2014) off the ground was a considerable task, which meant everyone involved was exhausted before the shoot began.
  5. 415 people are killed throughout the franchise (I ranked them all for The Ringer), that’s a lot of stunt work and big falls. 

The best thing about Wick is Pain is that it’s a warts-and-all look at the making of a legendary action franchise. It should be required viewing for anyone thinking about going into the industry because it does a great job of showcasing how difficult it is to make a movie. I worked in the Georgia film industry for many years and found myself on about 150 different film, TV, industrial, music video, and commercial sets. They were all exhausting, and my experiences don’t come anywhere close to what Stahelski, Reeves and the crew went through. After watching the documentary I understand why the movies work so well – nobody was content to make a stock action movie, they wanted to create something legendary, and that meant long days, little sleep, and ice baths (and divorces because of all the long days and nights)

The main takeaway from Wick is Pain is that Keanu Reeves is awesome. Without his dedication and ability to absorb pain, the franchise wouldn’t be nearly as good. Reeves turned 50 in 2014, which means he spent the majority of his 50s wrestling with burly stuntmen and being thrown around. Admittedly, it’s pretty cool that he got paid to drive cars and shoot guns, but his leadership and ability to stay on his feet during grueling productions make him one of my favorite actors. 

Final Thoughts – Watch the doc. Learn something.

The Movies, Films and Flix Podcast – Episode 626: Masters of the Universe (1987), Dolph Lundgren, and Buckets of Chicken

June 3, 2025

You can download or stream the pod on Apple Podcasts, Tune In, Podbean, or Spreaker (or wherever you listen to podcasts…..we’re almost everywhere).

If you get a chance please make sure to review, rate and share. You are awesome.

Mark and John discuss the 1987 fantasy epic Masters of the Universe (1987). Directed by Gary Goddard, and starring Dolph Lundgren, Courteney Cox, Frank Langella and a box of chicken, the movie focuses on what happens when a large shirtless man gets teleported to earth. In this episode, they also talk about Final Destination scenarios, Buick Slayers, and the excellence of Frank Langella.

If you are a fan of the podcast, make sure to send in some random listener questions (we love random questions). We thank you for listening, and hope you enjoy the episode!

You can download the pod on Apple Podcasts, Tune In, Podbean, or Spreaker.

Dangerous Animals (2025) – Review

June 3, 2025

Quick Thoughts 

  • Grade – B+ 
  • Dangerous Animals rules. Between The Loved Ones, The Devil’s Candy, and Dangerous Animals, director Sean Byrne is on a roll.
  • Jai Courtney is a hoot
  • Hassie Harrison is cool
  • Josh Heuston is likable
  • It’s an intelligently made thriller
  • I love that it got accepted into the Cannes Film Festival

What I appreciate most about Dangerous Animals is that it’s not content with being just another high-concept film about a serial killer feeding his victims to sharks. Director Sean Byrne went out of his way to make the film look gorgeous and he accomplished this by storyboarding, shooting on open water, and using prime lenses to capture excellent wide shots. Also, if you’ve watched a Byrne film (The Loved Ones, The Devil’s Candy) you’ll know that he gets the best out of actors and whether it’s Ethan Embry giving a career-best performance in The Devil’s Candy, or Jai Courtney stealing every scene in a Dangerous Animals, the actors trust Byrne and you can see it on the screen. 

Since 2017, Byrne has been attempting to follow up The Devil’s Candy but kept having projects fall through due to a lack of funding or the pandemic. This is why Nick Lepard’s script for Dangerous Animals must’ve felt like a revelation. For starters, it’s a movie about sharks which means funding would be easier to find,  which is the reason why director Matthew Holmes chose to direct and write Fear Below — the other 2025 Australian shark movie (both will be covered on Deep Blue Sea – The Podcast). Also, It isn’t as gut-wrenching as The Loved Ones and The Devil’s Candy, but it’s still a Sean Byrne movie in that it features a serial killer (Jai Courtney), a damaged hero (Hassie Harrison), a cool love interest (Josh Heuston), and most importantly — gnarly violence. Also, Byrne went out of his way to not villainize sharks by treating them with respect and awe. There are moments when the highly evolved creatures look incredible and there’s an all-timer movie shark that comes into play during the climax.  

The Cinematography by Shelley Farthing-Dawe is spectacular and starts beautifully with a cool wide shot of Tucker’s boat that showcases the beauty of the Coral Sea. In an interview with IndieWire, Farthing-Dawe said Byrne storyboarded the entire film and they used an ALEXA Mini LF with ARRI Signature Prime lenses to give it a great look. The unhurried wide shots give the movie an old-school vibe that isn’t rushed, and the lack of shaky cam shenanigans makes it seem more organized and methodical. Byrne and crew shot in open water for a few weeks which created terrible nights for everyone on the boat, but it looks fantastic on screen. Also, the practical boat lighting conceptualized by Byrne, Farthing-Dawe and production designer Pete Baxter looks great and it pays off when you see Jai Courtney’s exquisitely-lit curly hair (the hair lighting is legit)

Michael Yezersik’s score is welcomely bombastic and the song selection is inspired. Between The Donna’s cover of “Dancing with Myself,” “Baby Shark,” “Apocalypse” by Cigarettes After Sex, and “Dangerous” by Ryan Bingham (who is married to Harrison) it’s a well put together soundtrack, which isn’t surprising because the entire film is put together well.

Dangerous Animals opens with two tourists, Greg (Liam Greinke) and Heather (Ella Newton), heading out for a shark dive on a boat owned by a hulking guy named Bruce Tucker (Jai Courtney). Before you can sing the entirety of “Baby Shark,” things go bad and Heather is left chained to a metal bed frame in the guts of the boat. From there, we’re introduced to an American named Zephyr (Hassie Harrison), who traveled to Australia to surf and be left alone (she’s a window seat type of person). While stopping at a convenience store to buy dozens of bread rolls, she meets Moses (Josh Heuston) and the two good-looking people bond over their love of Creedence Clearwater Revival (CCR) and surfing. The following morning, Zephyr takes off early to catch waves and is abducted by Bruce (named after the shark in Jaws btw), who traps her in the same room as Heather. From there, Zephyr and Bruce engage in a fun game of cat-and-mouse that involves stab wounds, head kicks, and shark feedings. 

Jai Courtney’s beefed-up 6’1” frame makes Tucker a physically imposing villain who thoroughly enjoys his conquests. Dogs don’t like him, he loves to talk, and he considers himself to be a “genuine, walking-talking miracle” after he survived a shark attack as a child. He’s a coral snake among kingsnakes (or so he thinks), and he’s found his match with Zephyr, who became tough after many years of living in the foster system. Her name means “gentle breeze,” but she’s more of a tropical storm and I love that she doesn’t let the beefy serial killer intimidate her. Their battles are heightend for cinema, but there’s a believability and intelligence to their chess match that makes all the suspense and near misses work really well.

Dangerous Animals doesn’t care about reinventing the wheel (which is nearly impossible), but it does care about being the best possible version of itself — which is refreshing.

Final thoughts – Watch Dangerous Animals in theaters.