John’s Horror Corner: The Night Feeder (1988), an incredibly obscure film featuring a brain-eating mutant monster baby.
MY CALL: Watching this will accomplish two things: 1) you’ll wait a whopping 90 minutes to see the monstrosity from the VHS/DVD cover art for 90 seconds, and 2) you’ll have bragging rights among horror hounds for having found and seen this incredibly obscure movie. Those will be your only joys. 90 seconds of mutant monster baby, and bragging rights over a film most have never known to exist. MOVIES LIKE The Night Feeder: It’s Alive (1974, 2008), Dead-Alive (1992), Things (1989), The Unborn (1991) and Hideous! (1997) also feature laughable mutant monster babies to various humorous or twisted effect.
This schlocky oldie opens with a murder crime scene in with a woman’s wounded dead body, clothing tattered and a breast exposed. It’s the third such murder targeting young women and a local writer sticks her nose where it doesn’t belong when a friend of hers becomes the fourth.
The acting is pretty bad, but for deliberately watching an obscure B-movie it could really be a lot worse. Adding to the super low budget and haphazard ambiance, the night club and band performance scenes feel and look as unnatural as an early 80s New Wave British music video. This is where we are bombarded by boobs and stale exposition (e.g., who’s dating who, who works where, and who our victims will be for the evening).
Watching, or more accurately “enduring”, the first 30 minutes of this strange movie was not an enjoyable endeavor. It’s terribly slow, having no sense of dynamic pace. But things shift gears for the better for a few minutes during the awesomely gory autopsy scene which revealed that the victims were killed by brain extraction, leaving them with largely hollow skulls. This scene was pretty cool, but it’ll be over an hour before anything interesting happens again.
There are no fewer than five women’s boobs in this not-so-classy and obscure horror film—however, it is always somehow unraunchy or brief enough that it never feels smutty despite the volume of nudity. Not only that, but these must be the most boring boobs to ever grace the screen—I never knew I could care so little for boobs until this film came along. I also didn’t think the discovery of so many dead bodies could be boring. I’m not surprised the director (Jim Whiteaker) never did anything else. One-and-done for sure. Sometimes these bad movies can be quite laughable (e.g., Def By Temptation, Night Angel, Spellbinder, Nightwish), but unfortunately the cast and crew tried too hard for it to be enjoyably so-bad-it’s-good, yet didn’t try quite hard enough for anything to really be good at all.
Red herrings are abundant. The local New Wave Punk band DZS (pronounced “disease”), a street drug of the exact same name (DZS), and a strange hobo known citywide as “the creeper” are presented as possible killers. But if you bought or rented this movie, you’ve seen the cover art illustrating a mutant monster baby of sorts. So there go those theories.
Outside of the typically lame eye-gauged corpses, the special effects include some momentary slime drool, slimy undead (during a dream sequence), the highly entertaining autopsy effects (complete with the sound of pulling the skin from the skull), and, of course, the killer mutant baby!
This monstrous infant is THE ONLY REASON to watch this movie. You saw the awesome DVD cover, decided you had to see it (like me), you suffered through 90 minutes and now it’s finally time! Yes, that’s right, you don’t even see the baby until the very end. Take it or leave it.
Well, the mutant baby monster is pretty awesome (for an 80s B-movie). The problem is that we only see it for about a minute and then the movie ends. For real. A minute. Now, I really liked this monster and it looked like Evil Dead 2’s (1987) Henrietta and Total Recall’s (1990) Kuato had a baby. But the looooong wait for such little payoff makes this obscure and bizarre movie hard to recommend.
Trackbacks
- John’s Horror Corner INDEX: a list of all my horror reviews by movie release date | Movies, Films & Flix
- John’s Horror Corner: Mutilations (1986), a 70-minute B-movie with a Claymation Gorn alien monster. | Movies, Films & Flix
- John’s Horror Corner: Spider Labyrinth (1988; aka, Il nido del ragno), an Italian B-movie about a cult and their demonic spider god. | Movies, Films & Flix
- John’s Horror Corner: Spider Labyrinth (1988; aka, Il nido del ragno), an Italian B-movie about a cult and their demonic spider god. | Movies, Films & Flix
- John’s Horror Corner: Still/Born (2017), a postpartum horror about a baby-stealing demon. | Movies, Films & Flix
- John’s Horror Corner: Grace (2009), a “baby horror” film about a blood-feeding infant. | Movies, Films & Flix
- John’s Horror Corner: It’s Alive (2009), a gory over-the-top “baby horror” remake. | Movies, Films & Flix
- John’s Horror Corner: It’s Alive (1974), setting the stage for the “baby horror” subgenre with a sprinkle of Frankenstein-ian allegory. | Movies, Films & Flix
- John’s Horror Corner: It’s Alive II: It Lives Again (1978), the dawn of the mutant monster baby epidemic. | Movies, Films & Flix
- Bad Movie Tuesday: Xenophobia (2019), a clunky Sci-Fi anthology film about alien abduction victims and their stories. | Movies, Films & Flix
- John’s Horror Corner: The Suckling (1990; aka Sewage Baby), a very schlocky, very gory mutant monster baby B-movie. | Movies, Films & Flix
Must admit, I’ve never heard of this film, but sounds worth a look for the mutant monster baby effect. Is this film a bit like Its Alive, wasn’t that a film with a monster baby in it?
To answer your question, yes regarding It’s Alive, but only sort of regarding similarity. This plays out more like a lame mystery until the very end whereas It’s Alive plays out like a monster movie in style. You can buy this used from Amazon or new from Mondo’s website (that’s how I got it). It’s incredibly obscure and even more boring most of the time. haha
Cheers for letting me know, might check this out. I can see the comparison with Its Alive, you didn’t seem much of the creature in that either as I remember.
LOL It’s hilarious to me that something like this even exists. Like, how much reefer was the filmmaker and his friends smoking to think that this was even a good idea? The ‘monster baby’ in the photo looks pretty cool and creepy, in spite of how briefly it appeared on-screen, but this in no way looks like a movie that would be good or even watchable. I guess there’s a kind of pleasure to be gotten out of watching a movie that literally no one else is seen (come to think of it, maybe there’s a reason for that,) but really, it doesn’t look like there’s any reason to see this. Just wondering, how did you hear about gem and actually get a hold of a copy?
I believe this was one of the “suggested” films on the IMDB page of some other bad movie I had seen (maybe Night Angel or Def By Temptation).
Hahahah. Henrietta and Kuato! Good one. Didn’t see that! But I’ll stick to my comparison of Seinfeld’s Mr. Kruger, aka Daniel von Bargen, from Kruger Industrial Smoothing.
We have our moments, don’t we? lol