I have to point this out. What a great tagline!
“They were searching for proof…they found it!”
WHAT MAKES THIS A GOOD HALLOWEEN MOVIE? Just because it’s Halloween doesn’t mean all horror movies are a good fit. Some fit the October’s mood better than others and I consider Grave Encounters to do just that. It has what we love: great characters, humor, staging, dread and atmosphere. I don’t think I ever rolled my eyes at this film…I was too busy loving it! Flicks like this and The Hazing (2004) inspire me to continue taking chances when Netflix or Amazon throws a weird suggestion my way. I give this a direct-to-DVD horror “A”. IF YOU LIKE THIS, WATCH: The Paranormal Activity films (2007, 2010, 2011), White Noise (2005) and Session 9 (2001). Also, The Last Exorcism (2010).
This movie operates much like The Last Exorcism (2010). We follow Lance Preston and his Ghost Hunters film crew into a haunted mental hospital in search of the paranormal. It comes off as a satire, with a lot of sophomoric sarcasm and a totally fake medium. They laugh about things being “too over the top” between cuts and they pay a gardener twenty bucks to lie about seeing a ghost on the property. This works out fantastically! Normally the first 20-30 minutes of any horror are painful. They have barely-trained actors and a perfunctory storyline. Grave Encounters, however, has good acting and draws a lot of smiles as we learn about the film crew. This also serves as a superior directorial device to engage the viewers into caring about these characters.
The story is simple and certainly nothing new. The crew locks themselves into the abandoned hospital from 10pm-6am, giving them eight hours in total darkness to catch some paranormal activity on film. They get a tour from the caretaker and hear a few “real” ghost stories about the place to hype up their show (called Grave Encounters) and choose where to place static cameras. The execution is more like the Paranormal Activity films (2007, 2010, 2011). There’s a lot of slow tension build-up and you find yourself concentrating on the screen; staring waiting for something to move and listening for a subtle sound (like White Noise (2005)). This is a style that I love, but many people don’t like this.

What caught me off guard is that while everything was done surprisingly well in terms of acting, effects, sets, scares, and directing, the writing seemed very misguided. Not the dialogue, but the events. At first things seem sensible. Some random objects move here and there. But as the movie progresses and the intensity of the paranormal activity amplifies, the events seem less connected. The writers mix elements of “ghost” movies with elements of “house” movies. In the movie, Lance explains that there are static and intelligent hauntings. Static haunting account for the “house” movie subgenre, in which there is an energy echoing a past event (but there is no specific ghost, demon or spirit). Intelligent hauntings are our “ghost” story subgenre, in which a paranormal entity has some motivation and responds to human presence. In most horror movies, the writing will choose one subgenre or the other. Really never both.
Anyway, this subgenre combo doesn’t work. People start disappearing or dying and we don’t know why. Some weird things happen that make me want to guess “why this is happening” or “what the ghost wants” or “what happened in the hospital” or “are the crew members somehow linked to the hospital?” Ultimately, I was hit with a lot of red herrings which served no end. As a result, the end of the movie was simply when we ran out of people to kill or mysteriously disappear. I wanted a little more.

Despite this big overall writing flaw, each individual scene worked well. I enjoyed every five minute piece of the movie. Some scenes actually utilized some really cool (all be they disconnected) ideas to add to the eerie atmosphere. But after the first 30 minutes, the scenes just failed to make a story when assembled chronologically.
However critical I may sound, I really enjoyed this and strongly recommend it to any of you who enjoy occasionally taking a chance on an unknown direct-to-DVD horror.
John’s Horror Corner: Harbinger Down (2015), the entertaining yet lackluster mutant monster lovechild of The Thing (1982) and Leviathan (1989).
NSFW NSFW NSFW NSFW
NSFW NSFW NSFW NSFW
NSFW NSFW NSFW NSFW
MY CALL: Did I care about the characters? Not at all. Was the creepy, dire atmosphere captured? No. Was it a fun tentacle monster movie? Yes. Was it more of a blatant rip-off than an homage to The Thing (1982)? Also yes. BUT IT”S FUN! MOVIES LIKE Harbinger Down: The Thing (1982), The Thing (2011), Leviathan (1989), Blood Glacier (2013; aka, The Station).
Back in our Trailer Talk Podcast Episode (the 3rd trailer we discuss in the episode) we reviewed why fans of practical special effects and tentacle monster movies should be excited about Harbinger Down. Before seeing the film, it appeared to have all the makings of an admirable callback to The Thing (1982)…along with the newer The Thing (2011) and Leviathan (1989). Instead this was more like a lackluster rehashing and–while I must admit I had A LOT OF FUN watching this flick–it failed in properly honoring anything of the aforementioned sacred horror canon. But again, it remains a solidly entertaining way to spend 90 minutes of a monster movie lover’s evening. Especially if you enjoy tentacle monsters and squishy effects.
The meager budget is evident from the opening sequence, featuring a space shape “CGI-crashing” through the Earth’s atmosphere. Not gonna’ lie…I wasn’t impressed. The film quality (to a trained eye anyway) offered further indications of financial constraints. Worse yet, as we are introduced to the characters I feel I am also being introduced to writer/director Alec Gillis’ first time writing. I’m really not impressed. But hold on just a second! We’re not here for CGI space ships, gorgeous film quality or Oscar-worthy scripts are we? No. We came here with the promise of creature effects. So while I felt obligated to warn of the aforementioned flaws, these are not the kinds of flaws that should deter monster movie overs from watching this kind of movie.
The story follows an academic troupe (two grad students and their professor) who join the crew of the Harbinger, an Alaskan crabbing boat in the Bering Sea. The scientists aim to study a pod of Beluga whales and how their biology has been affected by climate change. After recovering some Soviet space wreckage embedded in an iceberg, the scientists’ interest change. It seems that this Russian space crew was returning from a moon mission researching tardigrades (also known as water bears or Tardigrada; biology’s most extreme environment-tolerant microorganisms known).
As quickly as characters are introduced, they find reasons to be catty or confrontational–not a good sign for when things undoubtedly take a bad turn later. After recovering the contaminated wreckage, we get the news that radio and phone communication is down because of the approaching storm! Making the smartest decision in the entire movie, the Harbinger’s captain (Lance Henriksen; Aliens, AVP, The Pit and the Pendulum) orders that the wreckage be placed in the ship hold until they return to the mainland.
Much as in Species (1995) and Apollo 18 (2011), and much to the delight of horror fans, the astronauts were exposed and their remains are now thawing in the Harbinger’s ship hold; safely away from the crew. But of course, some scientists just can’t wait and sneak down there. Upon examination, the scientists and Harbinger crew are exposed to the tardigrades, which evidently mutate at an alarming rate, even hijacking and changing the DNA of those they infect.
First time writer/director Alec Gillis has had loads of experience with special effects: Aliens (1986), Leviathan (1989), Starship Troopers (1997), Evolution (2001), AVP: Aliens vs Predator (2004) and AVPR (2007) to name a few of his wins in terms of creature effects. The effects in this film may roll a few unconvinced eyes, but he did all right with the creature effects. The effects were abundant, often gross or somewhat disturbing, and quite squishy! Contrastingly, Gillis has had no experience with writing or directing, so we hear terms like “climate change” thrown around a dozen times among a sea of stale line delivery. We even endure a crooked nod to Jaws (1975) in the form of “we’re gonna’ need a bigger bucket.” But let’s focus on the good, shall we?
We see many call backs to the familiar. An infected victim’s bloody goo self-coagulates and moves around on its own like The Thing (1982; blood test scene), the scientists seem to be experts on all things science (an annoying trait among scientist characters across the genre), the monstrous infection lies latent in the infected for a time like The Thing (1982), we have a scene with a woman waste deep in dangerous water reminding us of Newt in Aliens (1986), a naked woman is monstrously modified like The Thing (2011), the monster combines with the sum of its victims and eventually assumes a semi-insectoid crustacean-like form (after absorbing two tons of crab) like in Leviathan (1989), and in the end (like in The Thing (1982)) we resort to refreezing the monster (and everyone infected) in the ice.
Yup. I’ve seen something like this before…
Overall, this movie is simultaneously disappointing and entertaining at the same time. It captured none of the urgency, care for the characters, creepy atmosphere or gravity of those films it clearly emulated. Steering clear of the dire fear of “who goes there?” we know almost right away that just about everyone is infected, and no effort is properly manifested to make us fear who is or isn’t infected. On the other hand, there were loads of satisfying tentacles and monster shots! I, for one, will not be buying this for my collection. However, I do not at all regret spending a few bucks to see it OnDemand/PPV.
John’s Horror Corner: Things (1989), bizarre Canuxploitation mutant monster-baby horror at its worst!
NSFW NSFW NSFW NSFW NSFW NSFW NSFW NSFW
Let’s be clear, there’s a porn star, a bloody foot, an ant monster and a power drill on the DVD cover.
NSFW NSFW NSFW NSFW NSFW NSFW NSFW NSFW
Don’t read this article at work, bro!
NSFW NSFW NSFW NSFW NSFW NSFW NSFW NSFW
MY CALL: This is a strange, uber-cheap, home-made Canuxploitation film with abject writing, acting and editing, featuring a clothed porn star and cheaply made ant-like mutant monster babies. This is all you need to know to decide if this is for you. It’s probably not. MOVIES LIKE Things: Better for gore and less awkward was The Abomination (1989), followed more recently by smutty horror like They Bite (1995; the worst in this list), The Killer Eye (1999), Night of the Tentacles (2013), Bio-Slime (2010; the best in this list) and Blood Gnome (2004); all of which were much better than Things.
Evidently this film serves as a cautionary tale of the dangers of artificial insemination. Meet baby!
This bizarre film is about two guys (Don and Fred) who visit their friend Doug’s remote cabin only to find a breeding ground for monstrous creatures that look like surreal (but cheaply made) hybrids between ants and meatballs.
Evidently, she elected to have a natural childbirth.
After about 20 minutes of painfully slow scenes where little more happens than opening a beer and eating a sandwich, Doug’s girlfriend gives birth to some sort of insectoid monster. In fact, off camera, she evidently gave birth to many of them as the result of some experimental artificial insemination. The acting is “off” and nothing seems to “fit,” making this feel a lot like a weird dream. It’s surreal, but not in a flattering way.
From the opening scene there is something very perverse and disturbing about this film, like a more theater-centric approach to Troma. The dialogue feels dramatized for a mix of some twisted Broadway stage and an NC-17 MTV music video. If that didn’t make this sound classy enough yet, there is also full frontal nudity in the first 90 seconds of the film!
The DVD dust jacket reads “it remains perhaps the most bizarre, depraved and mind-boggling chunk of ‘Canuxploitation’ ever unleashed upon humanity.” I’m not so sure about that, but it is certainly depraved and bizarre. It even featured porn star Amber Lynn as a newsreporter; probably just to fool adult film enthusiasts into watching it. Apparently Amber was trying to really “act” for a change because her role in no way contributed to the exploitation aspect of the film. She had many lines (all delivered poorly by reading cue cards as she looked away from the camera) and she kept her clothes on.
What is she looking at!?!?!?!?!
Despite the zany, very dark exploitation of this film, what is most disturbing is the homemade score. Probably produced with a Casio keyboard, the “music” (if we’ll call it that) rarely matches the tone of the scene and is complemented by echoing background of creepy laughs, whispers of having babies, and begging for death in the opening scenes. The film quality, likewise awful, is grittier than an amateur 70s porno. The sound was so terrible; like it was dubbed with the volume set too high. To call the dialogue inane would be polite. It was like the writers were all severely mentally handicapped. But that’s ok, because the editing is horrible, too, with each scene lasting far longer than necessary to the point that the film moves at a sluggish pace.
But we don’t care about the score, dubbing or dialogue do we? No. We sought out this extremely obscure film because we wanted some 80s super-gore exploitation. And there’s a lot of that here. A skinned hand being prodded, all sorts of dismemberment, eyes and tongues are pulled out with squishy sound effects, lots of corpses and severed heads, the ant-baby monsters, sloppy gore…it’s all here. Just understand that there are much better ways to see this stuff nowadays.
Let’s just say I can’t recommend this. But maybe some would be interested since one Amazon reviewer called this “The Hope Diamond of bad movies.” So I’ll let you decide.
This image is how I felt while watching this film. By the way, this might have been the first ever straight to video Canadian horror movie.
Celebrating Five Years at Movies, Films and Flix!
Hello all. Mark here.
I want to start off by thanking my beautiful wife Megan for all the support (technical and friendship) and patience while I’ve spent a lot of my free time writing about Kurt Russell. MFF wouldn’t be around if it wasn’t for her and I am incredibly thankful. She set up the logos, bought the domain and basically dragged me out of the computer stone age. She also created this poster that I think is amazing.
I also want to thank everyone who reads MFF. You’ve endured a lot of Dolph Lundgren references and slogged through some soul crushing early posts. Hopefully, you’ve enjoyed the journey and now as you listen to the podcast or read about horror sweatshirts you look back at the trek fondly. It has been a fun journey that has taught me some very important things.
- People love Kurt Russell’s sleeveless shirts.
- People think The Shining was released in the 21st century.
- I will write about Ernest Scared Stupid whenever I have a chance.
- When you start a blog because of a Dolph Lundgren joke you will be totally fine.
- Pans Labyrinth is a “dark fantasy war thriller” with hints of horror.
- Nicolas Cage look really bored in the film Next.
.
I will always remember the first post I wrote for MFF. I was working on a show called Dual Survival in the Florida Everglades and I would work 14 hour days and come back to the hotel and attempt to write something pithy about Dolph Lundgren. It was tough going and each post took me a week to write. However, I really wanted to stick with it and build a site that people wanted to read. I knew the material wasn’t great but I enjoyed the process of making everything more readable.
Here are some MFF highlights throughout the years.
- John “the horror leviathan” Leavengood joined the site about six months in and has inundated the world with mainstream, non-mainstream and incredibly non-mainstream horror posts.
- We’ve teamed up with Sharkdropper for probably the greatest podcast in the history of the world (Listen to it people).
- I have the 21st century horror market cornered. Viva la Cabin in the Woods!
It has been a fantastic five years and I look forward to continuing the Dolph Lundgren inspired journey to movie criticism Valhalla! (not sure what that means). Thank you for sticking around and I promise more beautifully random things to come.
The MFF Podcast #28: The Last Pod on the Left – A Wes Craven Tribute
Hello all. Mark here.
The MFF podcast is back and we are honoring the horror master Wes Craven. You can download the pod on Itunes or head over to Blog Talk Radio to stream it. If you get a chance please make sure to review, rate and share. You are awesome!
We here at MFF love Wes Craven and consider him to be a legend of cinema. He revolutionized the horror world three times over three decades and his impact on film will never be forgotten. In this pod we look back at his career and wax poetic about all things Wes.
As always we answer random questions and our discussions lead us to some interesting places. Here is what you can look forward to.
- Exorcist in Space and the repercussions of zero gravity space vomit.
- Can Ash Williams catch a knife like Jack Burton?
- Did a stuntman on Black Sheep blow out his hamstring and land on a sheep?
Viva la Freddy!
Sit back, relax and listen to three guys discuss the legacy of Wes Craven.
You can listen to the pod on Blog Talk Radio or head over Itunes so you can download, rate, review and share. Thanks!
The Grand Seduction: A Pleasant Film That Proves Brendan Gleeson Has the Greatest Beard on the Planet
.
The Grand Seduction is a pleasant little remake that doesn’t mind taking its time. It is a word for word remake of the French-Canadian film Seducing Dr. Lewis. There is an earnestness and laid back charm that will remind the viewer of The Full Monty, Waking Ned Devine and Saving Grace. If you want to spend 90 minutes with salty fisherman trying to convince a plastic surgeon to stay in their small city you will love this film.
The Grand Seduction tells the story of a small port city looking to hire a full time doctor so a recycling company will move into their town. The fishing has dried up and the locals have taken to collecting government checks then spending them at the bar. Mayor Murray French (Brendan Gleeson) goes about trying to find a doctor and comes across a drug addled plastic surgeon named Paul (Taylor Kitsch). Paul was busted for cocaine possession and his punishment is to work off a month of community service at the small fishing village. The guy is used to city life and their is zero allure for him in the town. So, they go about learning cricket, cooking Indian food and listening in on his phone calls in order to make him more comfortable. Things eventually go awry and it all ends in a charming fashion.
The Grand Seduction is an uneven little thing that wears its heart on its sleeve. Everybody is pleasant, problems are solved easily and the scenery is glorious. The entire town may be lying to the doctor but they do so with a good heart. It is all a little odd but you have to appreciate people who learn how to play Cricket in an attempt to find work. Their willingness to take any kind of work is refreshing and the core relationship between Murray and his best friend Simon (Gordon Pinsent) is believable and organic. I love this exchange between them:
Murray French: This is it. I’m leavin’. Will you come visit me in town?
Simon: Nope.
Murray French: Simon…
Simon: I’m afraid of flying.
Murray French: Yeah, well drive down.
Simon: I don’t drive.
The best thing about The Grand Seduction is Brendan Gleeson. The guy can do anything and I would put money on him having the best beard on the planet. If you haven’t watched In Bruges, The Guard or Calvary hunt them out and you will love them. Another nice thing is that Taylor Kitsch (Friday Night Lights, Battleship) finally gets to do something other than brood or yell and you can tell he loves every second of this film. There has to be worse things in the world than filming in beautiful Newfoundland.
The Grand Seduction is a pleasant film about an entire town lying to a plastic surgeon. If you want to watch something breezy and low stakes you will 100% enjoy this little film. Let me know what you think!
Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials: The Running Strikes Back
What I loved about The Maze Runner is that it told a lean and mean story on a budget. It flowed quickly and introduced you to a likable crew of survivors that had been put through the wringer. Director Wes Ball did a lot with little and I was excited and cautious about the Scorch Trials. Part of me was excited for the action set pieces and time spent with a likable young cast. Part of me was cautious because bigger budgeted sequels often introduce hundreds of new characters, unnecessary plot expansion and things turned up to 11.
I am happy to say that even though The Scorch Trials turns things up to 11 and introduces copious characters we still get plenty of what we came for. The plot does get muddled underneath post-apocalyptic muck but it never gets buried under the weight of expository dialogue. I’m amazed at the way Ball was able to make 17 sprinting scenes exciting. It gets to the point where the characters are running through a collapsed skyscraper while being chased by the angry undead. Not only are they hundreds of feet from the ground they have to deal with cracked glass windows, perilous cliffs and zombies straight from World War Z.
The Scorch Trials revolves around the Maze survivors escaping the death trap and being brought to another death trap. Things look good until they learn a guy named Janson (Aidan Gillen) is turning maze survivors into human blood banks. In their blood is a cure for the world ending plague and they escape before they are strung up. The problem is the secure facility is surrounded by desert and things go from bad to worse as they navigate the worst world ever. From there they run through malls, abandoned cities, deserts, underground mines and mountains in order to avoid shady corporations and zombies. Alliances change, people are double crossed and you actually get tired watching these poor kids run around.
I’ve been complaining about the additions but you can’t be annoyed when Alan Tudyk (Serenity, Tucker and Dale), Giancarlo Esposito (Breaking Bad), Barry Pepper (Saving Private Ryan, 25th Hour), Aidan Gillen (Game of Thrones, The Wire) and Lili Taylor (Say Anything, The Conjuring) pop up in a film. Their characters expand the world and provide much needed assistance/problems to the main characters. I also like the young additions that were added and I think Jacob Lofland (Mud), Rosa Salazar and Nathalie Emmanuel (Game of Thrones) will do some great running in the third film.
Maze Runner: The Scorch Trials is a successful sequel that has genuinely exciting set pieces and doesn’t get lost in way too much plot. If you liked the original you will enjoy the sequel. Also, it will teach you to never turn on the lights in an abandoned mall full of zombies.
The MFF Podcast #27: Van Damme-MANIA
You can stream all episodes on BlogtalkRadio or download the podcast on Itunes.
If you get a chance please REVIEW, RATE and SHARE the pod!
We hope you enjoyed our previous episode: Spring and Creep, two new wave horror hybrids.
SUMMARY: This week the MFF crew shakes things up and gears up the nostalgia discussing the early filmography (1988-1997) of Jean-Claude Van Damme and explaining why JCVD stood out from his 90s action movie star peers.
We also answer such important questions as…
“Are all doors in JCVD’s house break-away so he can kick his way from room to room?”
“What year was the peak of JCVD’s career?”
“Was the choreography in 90s action movies ever any good?”
“Why do they keep showing us JCVD’s butt in the final fight in Kickboxer?”
This week’s podcast is based on the following articles:
Best Training Scenes of Film: Part 1: Preparing for the big fight with Sylvester Stallone, Jean-Claude Van Damme and Team Korea.
Sit back, relax and learn about everything you missed.
If you haven’t seen some of these movies, be comforted that we will geekily inform you as to why you should watch them.
JCVD has a Chinese penny for your thoughts…So if you get a chance please REVIEW, RATE and SHARE the pod!
You can stream the pod at the Sharkdropper website, listen to us on with your mobile app OneCast, or download the podcast on Itunes.
Proudly sponsored by the audiobook company Audible, your new MFF podcast episode is here!
John’s Horror Corner: The Visit (2015), M. Night Shyamalan’s latest twist into a very credible dark fairy tale.

MY CALL: This film is strange, loaded with disarming comic relief, geriatrically creepy, twisted, and doesn’t feel like found footage…all in a good way. The theme would have worked better if rated-R, but this still stands out as an exceptional with solid performances from our young actors.
M. Night Shyamalan (Signs, The Village) has always been a favorite writer and director of mine. I don’t care what the haters say. He picked up some flak for The Village (2004), The Happening (2008) and The Lady in the Water (2006), but I tend to enjoy his movies despite the noticeable drop in quality after The Sixth Sense (1999), Unbreakable (2000) and Signs (2002). I won’t even get into The Last Airbender (2010)—we’ll just call that a mistake. And I was captivated by Devil (2010; which he did not direct).
More playfully approached than in his past endeavors, Shyamalan returns to tell the Grimm-undertoned story of two young children going to meet their estranged grandparents for the first time. Their mother (Kathryn Hahn) is conflicted about the visit, having not spoken to her parents in the fifteen years since she left on bad terms as a teenager. We all know from the trailers that the grandparents seem nice yet weird. Perhaps just early onset dementia…? Or perhaps a big Shyamalanadingdong twist! Because that’s what we’ve come to know Shyamalan for, right? Big twists. Bruce Willis was dead the whole time! Sam Jackson was the villain! Everything happens for a reason—SWING AWAY! So it’s fair to say that there is almost definitely something behind the curtain that isn’t evident from the trailer.
The performances by the two child actors are compelling and manage to direct us through the story surprisingly effectively. The 13 yr old boy Tyler (Ed Oxenbould) seems gawky at first, but he turned out to be great and what seemed the least credible about him at first quickly became his most endearing characteristic. He provides the more naïve perspective along with the comic relief, rapping in front of Nana, joking about dead bodies in the work shed (far before anything strange has happened), and being the first to frighten. The first two thirds of this film will find you smiling quite often and nearly entirely due to this character’s welcomed antics. It may downplay the urgency but it also contributes to lowering our guard.
The older sister Becca (Olivia DeJonge), our filmographer in this odyssey of estranged family reunification, is the serious one. Intent on uncovering and documenting her grandparents’ forgiveness for her mother’s alienation, she keeps the story grounded and provides a credible case for found footage as she sets out to simultaneously feed her hunger for filmmaking and mend a sundered family. She is articulate, perceptive beyond her years, and along with Tyler she harbors a powerful insecurity after recently being abandoned by her father.
Both children excel in offering refreshingly sincere performances and credible characters. Between their anxious mother and their quirky senescing grandparents, these children serve as our home base in terms of sanity. But we also watch as they turn a blind eye to some red flags in the name of senility and their desire to have a more complete family.
After some understandably awkward introductions, their week of family bonding kicks off with some home cooking by day and an intro to the weirder side of senility by night. It turns out that Nana (Deanna Dunagan) suffers from a form of nocturnal dementia called sun downing. Her mornings are filled with a sweet, meek farmhouse manner. But her late nights are filled with projectile vomiting, charging through the hallways, and nude wall scratching—making her a good candidate for a home visit from an old priest and a young priest. But it’s not just Nana. Pop Pop (Peter McRobbie; Daredevil) is occasionally non-responsive, paranoid, confused, and he’s doing something in his work shed. He also doesn’t want the kids in the basement or to leave their bedroom after 9:30pm. Many elderly folks run a tight ship and have some reasonable rules of the house, but these just raise suspicions.
“Eat all you want.”
“Could you get in the oven to clean it?”
How Hansel and Gretel-esque.
With each day they seem to encounter increasingly strange behavior lending less and less credence to the grandparents’ mental wellness or the kids’ safety. However, our guard is dropped with the understanding that “they’re just old.” We are reminded of this notion repeatedly by the grandparents themselves. We want to accept their frailties and overcome our feeling of uneasiness. We, too, have grandparents and we don’t want to take away their independence should they start to fade…at least, not until they’ve faded too far. And how far is too far? This story tests that boundary.
“What do you mean they’re acting weird?”
As if serving as a countdown of some horrible conclusion, each day is marked by a caption on the screen…Monday….Tuesday…Wednesday… The visit wears down to its last days and the weird behavior mounts, and so does Becca’s penchant to film interviews and capture the catharsis of forgiveness to help heal their long-estranged family. No matter how strange (or bad) things seem, she still wants her interview—and Nana really doesn’t seem comfortable giving that up. One must wonder why.
I often questioned just where this ride was taking us? Some people stop by the house and I start to wonder if the grandparents are possessed by some unconventional means, or if they are part of a cult, or if they are being compelled or threatened to do something to the kids. Was their mother unknowingly going to be a victim of one of these things until she escaped by running away?
With The Village (2004) and The Lady in the Water (2006) under his belt, it should come as no surprise that Shyamalan festoons his story with dark fairy tale imagery. “We’re off to grandmother’s house” located far from the nearest neighbors with Nana filling her fare with freshly baked confections, a Grimm flashback as she urges her granddaughter into the oven with a bizarre smile, a grandfather smacking of a twisted “woodsman” role, things start out so nice but slowly degenerate into their true nature, and all of the house “rules.” Further seasoning this fairy tale stew is Becca’s reference to a magical elixir (i.e., forgiveness) to cure her mother and Nana tells tales of another planet where everyone can be happy together. This is framed as a cautionary tale, but with the caution kept secret until the end.
More creepy than scary, littered with down-to-earth comic relief, and with a premise that makes found footage appropriate–this is an example of film done right as it distracts us from the finish line while providing all the signs that clearly point us in the right direction. It also hardly feels like found footage after the first 10 minutes as the shots are typically steady.
The final twist is horrifying in concept but doesn’t translate to film as effectively as Shyamalan’s past reveals have. But I don’t care. I liked it a lot for what it was. The scenes are all entertaining, whether funny or tense. Truly, though, from the light-hearted and often comical opening acts, Shyamalan was trying to transition us to more dire feelings. It only sort of worked. I must also admit that this was something that really wanted to be rated R. Of course, that’s not Shyamalan’s style. But I think that an R-treatment would have improved it; it would have fueled the shift from comic relief in the beginning to a third act of greater gravity.
Overall, I was very pleased with this.
That Awkward Moment in Horror, Part 3: Did Total Recall borrow from Freddy’s Revenge and Child’s Play?
That Awkward Moment in Horror: Part 1: Classic Horror, Sexuality and Dating
THAT AWKWARD MOMENT WHEN YOU REALIZE THAT IN TOTAL RECALL CHUCKY WAS COMING OUT OF MARSHALL BELL’S STOMACHE LIKE FREDDY IN FREDDY’S REVENGE.
Remember A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy’s Revenge (1985)? Yeah that movie was totally weird. There’s this scene where we find Freddy’s form emerging through Jesse’s stomach with his face pushing through the skin and his claws piercing through his fingertips; he basically rips his way out of Jesse’s skin. I loved this unconventional transformation scene.
And in this film Marshall Bell plays Jesse’s gym coach. But hold on just a second! Five years later in Total Recall (1990), Marshall Bell played a guy with a little man that pushed his way out of his stomach, too!
Hmmmmm….coincidence?
And on top of that, I’m not the first person to think Kuato looked somewhat familiar…
In fact, I was sitting in the theater 25 years ago with my god-brother who, upon seeing Kuato, screamed “dude, that looks like Chucky (Child’s Play)!” Before the internet, people. He called it as I’m sure so many others did. We’re on to you, Total Recall. Watch your back!
That Awkward Moment in Horror: Part 1: Classic Horror, Sexuality and Dating


































































