Skip to content

Trailer Talk: The Kick

November 10, 2011

By John Leavengood

I’d like to start by pointing out how stoked I am about this movie.  When I want classic, semi-serious, fun kick-flicks I would turn to Van Damme (recently of The Expendables II, Assassination Games).  For somewhat realistic and brutally honest fight flicks, I want Michael Jai White (Never Back Down 2, Blood and Bone, Undisputed 2) and Scott Adkins (Undisputed 2, The Expendables 2).  For technically surreal flare I look to recent Thai action installments like Tony Jaa’s Ong-Bak and The Protector or Chocolate.  Well, from the folks who brought you Ong-Bak, here’s The Kick.

Here’s the TRAILER.

This looks GREAT.  540’s and 720’s abound, along with some jump spin-kicks which look like they might even be 900’s!  It looks like the premise might be a bit hokey, but whatever.  The stunts alone make this movie worth owning.  Here’s another trailer that’s cool but is less informative.

Bunraku

November 9, 2011

By John Leavengood

MY CALL: Revenge is an act of style—one that no Kill Bill fan should miss. If you are careful about your expectations, this movie could be a great pick for you. [B+]  IF YOU LIKE THIS, WATCH: Kill Bill, The Good The Bad and The Weird, The Warrior’s Way, Sin City…maybe even Sucker Punch (which wasn’t good, but had some great scenes and ideas).  SIDEBAR: I have no idea what the name of the movie means.  If they mentioned it in the movie, I missed it, and I miss little in movies.

This appears to be another take on genre-crossing in a genre-style movie.  Previous examples include the wildly successful Sin City movies, popular western splices like The Good The Bad and The Weird and The Warrior’s Way, and the stillborn Sucker Punch.  But all these movies were well-advertised and wide theatrical releases (in Asia, at least, for The Good The Bad and The Weird).  Should I approach this lack of advertising as a snake’s rattle and keep my expectations low?  When I stumbled across this I thought “This movie features Josh Hartnett, Demi Moore, Ron Perlman, Gackt, Woody Harrelson and Kevin McKidd, and I had never heard of it or saw a trailer.  How does that happen?  Is this a weird little gem waiting to be discovered, or an utter Sucker Punch tragedy?”

The opening credits are cleverly presented during an animated story background.  The style was much like that of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows Part One or Hellboy 2: The Golden Army.  When moviemakers really care about a movie, they make an effort to have the opening credits “affect” the viewer somehow.  Even if it’s only music over a black screen, moods are set and pace is foreshadowed.  I’ve commented on the great opening credits of The Good The Bad and The Weird, and that movie was awesome.  This made for a promising start.

In this perhaps futuristic world guns have somehow been banned, making way for a resurgence in swordsmanship and a feudal yakuza-esque gang culture.  A young, Doc Holidayish brawler (Hartnett) and a swordless samurai team up to exact their revenge against the ruthless king of the hill, “The Woodsman” (Perlman).  To do so, they must kill their way through leagues of henchman and his  nine right hand men, one of which is played by a sleek Kevin McKidd.

This film is VERY stylistic.  The effects and music smack of Scott Pilgrim versus The World with comic book stylings of villainy and storyline much like Kill Bill.  The combat follows suit, with choreography focusing more on a dance-like technical precision than producing a realistic fight. It’s more like theater than cinema.  In fact, the set designers erected intentionally artificial-looking structures in order to unsubtly accent this feeling.  Sets and wardrobe contain elements of the present, the future, the old west, and the early 1900’s.  Many theatrical devices are employed as well.  All of this synergistically produces an other-worldly feel.

The style of this movie is rare and difficult to execute. The fights are fun, the scenes are clever, and (with the exception of Demi Moore’s role) the characters were interesting.

Bad Movie Tuesday:Trespass

November 8, 2011

Or as it is called in Norway: Loud Noises

When I heard that a movie directed by Joel Shumacher and starring Nicole Kidman and Nic Cage was going direct to DVD I became very excited. It meant that Trespass had to be incredibly bad. Cage has starred in many bad theatrical films like Next, Season of the Witch, The Wicker Man and Drive Angry 3D(read these reviews, you will love them)… I figured this movie had to be a special kind of bad. The kind of bad movie where Nic Cage wears these glasses.

The answer was simple as to why the film is bad. It is a movie where everybody yells bad dialogue constantly. Nic Cage yells, Nicole Kidman yells, Cam Gigandet yells, the junkie thieves yell, Nic Cage yells again then loses it…then yells more, the viewer starts yelling. Also, during a flashback Nic yells at Nic(ole) via the phone.

I have never heard more yelling in a film. It gets ridiculous at points. If you are a thief you probably don’t want to be yelling a lot. Hans Gruber never yelled in Die Hard. Paul Bettany never screamed in the bad movie Firewall. It seems like lazy filmmaking. All I could think of was Anchorman’s Brick Tamland saying “loud noises!”

Two seconds after this picture Cage yells:

I really hope the sound guy made a lot of money because the levels must have been through the roof. the poor boom operator must have been on double duty. I bet by the end of the film they were calling him “What” because every time somebody said something the boom guy said “what?”

The swearing-in this film is very creative as well. Nic Cage screams “sh** F***, Sh** Fu**ing bastard and Fu** Di**. If I was the guy being trespassed on by moustached attractive junkies I’d be swearing creatively as well.

The movie Trespass centers around a bunch of attractive junkie thieves trying to steal diamonds from Nic Cage. The plan goes bad and screaming occurs. Nic gets his hand smooshed. Kidman gets thown into 17 walls and bad decisions rule the day.

The film goes down like this:

1.The robbers ask Cage where the money is.

2. Nic Cage defies them and swears a lot.

3. The robbers yell, swear and threaten Nicole Kidman (who then calls her agent and fires him for putting her in the movie).

The process repeats itself X30.

Watch this film if you have a new sound system and need to break it in.

Trailer Talk: Underworld Awakening

November 6, 2011

There is a moment in the trailer when a pouty leather clad Kate Beckinsale says “This day had to come.”  There are three things she could be talking about.

1.Was she talking about another sequel?

2. The Underworld series finally broke the World Record for most spins, flips, back flips, somersaults and cartwheels

3. Humans find out about the war between Lycans and Vampires and attempt to wipe them all out while Nu-Metal plays in the background.

These movies are not good. Vampires pout, werewolves growl and bullets fly in slow motion.  However, I’ve watched them all and I will watch this one. They are kind of like the Resident Evil films but better.

The trailer also elicited some unintentional laughs. An angry vampire says “We must stand and fight.” In my head I envisioned the vampires sitting down and fighting. I’ve watched a lot of fight scenes and the only time I’ve witnessed successful chair fighting is when it is Tom Cruise (MI:3) or Jason Statham (Killer Elite, Transporter).

This movie will make a lot of money. More cows will die due to leather outfits and Kate Beckinsale will find new ways to pout whilst holding a gun and flipping.

John’s Horror Corner: Hardware (1990)

November 5, 2011

John Leavengood

MY CALL:  This is just plain fun if you’re looking for  a cheesy sci-fi-horror that takes itself too seriously.  The premise is creative, in a  schizophrenically misled kind of way.  IF YOU LIKED THIS, THEN WATCH:  Hmmm, movies that feature killer robots with cool or fun effects…Hellboy 2: The Golden Army, Virus, Robocop 2, Terminator, and for a real Mars-setting killer robot movie try Red Planet.

This movie may raise a brow to you as you wonder “Why should I care about this?  I never heard of it.”  But to a seasoned movie fanatic this flick has quite an intriguing cast.  It includes Mark Northover (better known as the unforgiving landowner Burglekutt from Willow), Iggy Pop as Angry Bob the DJ, Dylan McDermott (Cemetery Man, Hamburger Hill, In the Line of Fire), and our heroine Stacey Travis (Phantasm II, The Super, Only the Strong).  It also made some money, grossing over $5
million on a $1.5 million dollar budget.

Somewhere in a post-nuclear apocalyptic world of crimson dunes and matching skies a man scavenges a severed robot head, among other shrapnel, half immersed in the sand.  Between his attire and the surrounding environs, it appears as if one of the land pirates in Cyborg or Mad Max has ventured to a more friendly-atmospheric Mars.  The technology in this “futuristic” world nearly rivals a 1980’s arcade game.

Mo (McDermott) is a regular Joe with a too-good-for-him artistic redhead girlfriend Jill (Travis).  After months in the arid wasteland his fatigues are magically untattered and stain-free and his boots are still shiny, yet in the shower he practically sheds filth as if he was mud wrestling.  These tiny inconsistencies warn me to brace myself for quality film-making.  Despite the Hell hole suggested by the set designers, hair gel and the entertainment industry abound, apparently making it through the apocalypse unscathed.  They’ve got radio talk shows and GWAR music videos.  What more could you want back in 1990? So we (but not our heroine) come to discover that this robot head is from some  self-repairing combat droid.  Its  self-repair occurs by way of stop-motion telekinesis—it’s a lot like an old Tool music video.  The mecha-regenerative head’s face, detaching jaw, and crawling claws make me question whether or not Guillermo del Toro used  this as his idea for the Golden Army soldiers in Hellboy 2.  So similar, in fact, I find it doubtless!  Other than the self repair scene and the head, this kill-droid is pretty lame-looking.

Jill ends up trapped with this terror of a droid in her apartment.  The effects, acting and action are all very poor.  This may be the worst killer robot movie ever.  However the idea was pretty cool and likely fueled movies like Virus and Hellboy 2 with some great innovations.  The end gets a bit weird-trippy and the gore is funny.  In the end this drone, which has all of the dexterity of a drunk NYC hobo, is
defeated by a hot shower.  Strangely enough, when you clean up a hobo they’re much less off-putting as well.

Despite all the flack I’m flinging at it, I enjoyed it. It’s a bit slow, but it has some interesting ideas and effects (for its time).  If you appreciated the computerless effects of the 80’s and some mindlessly silly sci-fi flicks, then this should be right up your alley.

Flypaper

November 3, 2011

By John Leavengood

MY CALL:  This is a Clue mach-up with a  bank robbery-gone-wrong.  But what really  went wrong was the movie.  [C-]  Take my opinion with more grains of salt than normal, though.  Amazon reviewers really seemed to like this movie.  I guess it just wasn’t my flavor of “dumb.”  WHAT TO WATCH INSTEAD:  The Ocean’s  11-13, Confidence, Duplicity, Trapped in Paradise.

This  movie really missed the mark.  I mean, I  was entertained.  But I’m not going to  advise anyone see this unless they’re a die-hard Patrick Dempsey fan.  Even playing someone with  OCD, Dempsey  manages to get a bit too melodramatic.  It pains me to say that because any other day I’d say he’s a good actor.  I’ve been a Dempsey fan for twenty  years.  The movie’s sort of funny.  However I may not have laughed out loud once  more than once.  More the occasional  appreciative smile of one of the rare funny moments or one-liners.  This may have been the ONLY  movie EVER where  Jeffrey Tambor was neither likeable nor funny, and he’s REALLY funny.  Yet somehow, not in this.

Patrick  Dempsey (who plays Trip) leads a big cast with a ton of recognizable actors.  Even if all of them aren’t millionaires, most  of them have done some great work.  My  how far they’ve fallen since Oh Brother  Where Art Thou, The Help and Identity.  Anyway, Trip is a quirky, methodical, Sherlock Holmes-y, hypercognitive who  finds himself at a bank when two different sets of bank robbers arrive…to rob  the same bank…at the same time.  One team  is a pair of smash-and-grab job idiots.  The other is a technically sound team of professional thieves.  Naturally, there’s disagreement between the  two gangs, but luckily Trip decides to risk his life and play mediator.  At times, Trip is a little more up-tight Rain Man and a little less Holmes.  He’s solving something and is cluelessly shocked when interrupted.  Scenes like that are a bit  annoying, as  Dempsey lacks Hoffman’s savant-y finesse.

These bank robbers had arrived at the end of the business day to take the vault over night and take the customers hostage.  So there is plenty of time for things to go wrong. With a dawning mystery of how two groups of bank robbers ended up at the bank at the same time, the movie turns into a Clue-style mystery.  Some meant-to-be-outrageous things happen that really “should” have been funny.  Trip spends the evening making random advances at a semi-cute teller.  That “should” have been funny.  I might have  cracked a smile.  But this was not worth  my time.  I really didn’t even enjoy  disliking this movie.

The best lines and humor came from the B-list actors.  Take that as a warning sign, like when a spooked skunk lifts its tail, and slowly back away from this one.

White Irish Drinkers

November 2, 2011

By John Leavengood

MY CALL:  A sincere, cathartic, jagged little pill that  offers a certain something; a form of closure akin to This Boy’s Life or Good Will  Hunting.  [A]  IF YOU LIKE THIS, WATCH:  This  Boy’s Life, Good Will Hunting.  TRAILER:  This is a little misleading, but here you are.

Our witty, quippy and sharp-tongued, yet plausibly average star navigates a  palpable mid-70’s Brooklyn.  From an  under-privileged neighborhood, Brian’s social group fails to understand that  college could be anything but an excuse not to get a job.  Brian is torn between art and the criminal  proclivities of his manipulative and abused older brother, Danny.  He may be from a rough neighborhood, but he’s  a sweet, boyish twenty-or-so with an aw-shucks smile and Elijah Wood’s  innocence.  Hearing the newfound insights  of a friend, Brian begins to dream that college could be his way out of this  world which he undeniably uses to temper his self-worth.

Stephen Lang (Avatar, TV’s Terra Nova) performs excellently as the  callous, abusive father.  Karen Allen  brilliantly plays his overworked wife whose Herculean efforts fail to hold the  family together as she casts a blind eye to her husband’s actions.  Most interactions with the parents are difficult,  but there are some soothingly endearing moments like recurring teasing about  mom’s cooking and nearly forgotten memories of how dad was before he got like this.

Drawing our  attention is Brian’s artwork.  The  director carefully utilized this pathway to steer the plot, educe mood and  engage undertones about Brian’s fragile relationships with the small world he  knew, his crumbling family, and his own self doubt.

Bad Movie Tuesday: The Big Bang

November 1, 2011

“Reality is a wave function. Sub atomic particles movie through liquid nitrogen that can go anywhere in the universe and entangle itself in a relationship.”

These are things you want to read in a book or hear in a film by Stanley Kubrick. However, these are not words you want to hear in a direct to DVD neo-noir with a 13% ranking on Rotten Tomatoes.  Black holes, worm holes, doughnut holes and a confused looking Antonio Banderas are the themes of this film.

Something about this film told me it would be bad. I call it “Preview Sense.” I sensed the preview was attempting to hoodwink the audience into thinking it was a plucky noir with barely a mention of physics. My “preview sense” has taught me that if a movie is bad they give away everything in the trailer just to get audiences into the seats. For example, Dream House and The Double did this and both bombed commercially and critically.

Previews have been known to make action films out of drama period flicks. Also, a woman is suing the producers of the great film Drive because she said “the previews misrepresented the film.” The woman wanted more car chases. I’m happy she hasn’t gotten ahold of this film yet.

The preview is trying to hide that this is a movie where good actors slum in a bad movie and talk a lot while orange, blue and yellow lights bombard them. Hyper stylized movies rarely work. This movie seemed too stylized. I found two examples in the preview. The abundance of lighting gells and Sam Elliot saying:

“God is the wizard of Oz, he is the man behind the curtain and tomorrow I am yanking back that curtain.”

The moment I heard that quote I knew the film would put a soul hurting on me. So, obviously I had to watch and use it for Bad Movie Tuesday material.

This movie reminded me of the scene in Beerfest where Jay Chandrasekhar thinks he is the smoothest man alive. However, he is just incredibly drunk. I’m thinking this is the same thing that happened to the writer. He thought he was writing 2001 2.0 but he wrote Johnny Mnemonic 3.6.

The movie revolves around an imprisoned Antonio Banderas telling the story of how he was hired by a large Russian to find a woman. Along the way he meets various intellectuals, scientists, dwarves, rappers, waitresses and an angry James Van Der Beek.

I really do not remember the rest of the film. It all blends together in an a ball of “huh?” People talk, other people talk, Antonio Banderas talks….. The film is a whole lot of talking. If are making a direct to DVD noir film you should listen to Elvis and have “a little less conversation and a little more action.”

Teach yourself “Preview Sense.” It will save you time, money and sanity.

Transformers 3: Dark Side of the Moon

November 1, 2011

By John Leavengood

MY CALL:  Great, must-see action sprinkled over two scoops of mediocrity.  WHAT TO WATCH INSTEAD:  After seeing the first two of the franchise I’d say tap on the breaks, like Michael Bay should have.  While the action stays up to snuff, the plot and humor just seem to get worse.

I just never found myself invested in the plot.   Essentially, I just watched scene after scene waiting for the next cool action sequence.  And there were plenty of those; just none of the fun (or funny) inter-action scenes that were so delightfully common in part one.

It’s a shame when such superior production value and effects are washed away in a sea of cheap tricks and mediocrity.  Numerous attempts at cute humor feel forced and the general seriousness of the Transformer characters—which had such a strong foundation in the franchise opener—become somehow yet less credible than even Revenge of the Fallen’s goofy, urban-style twins.  The already fantastic shift from vehicle to humanoid robot just doesn’t seem to be enough for the producers as part two featured a puma-shaped Transformer and now part three’s “sandworms” [aka, Decepticon Shockwave], a vulture-bot, and one that even looks like the Predator!  Part one had some, too, but the scorpion Decepticon battle scene was pretty heavy, so I’ll forgive it.  Now these “extra special” Decepticons seem a bit too common.  We don’t need more than one or two new Transformers per sequel.  Tap on the breaks a bit, Bay!

A few flavorful changes were welcomed.  For example, Optimus Prime has adopted a phalanx-fighting style a la Troy’s Brad Pitt or 300’s Gerard Butler.  A nosy Ken Jeong, an OCD John Malkovich and an ever-debonair Patrick Dempsey were also welcomed additions.  The least welcomed: an overly annoying Frances McDormand.

Behind the Mask: The Rise of Leslie Vernon

October 31, 2011


Behind the Mask: The Rise of Leslie Vernon

by: Megan Arnall
Happy Halloween everyone! If you are a fan of horror movies, documentaries and what goes on behind the scenes…this is the movie for you tonight!
What I love about Leslie Vernon is that this movie answers all of the questions that we have about horror movies after we leave the theater. In this movie you’ll find out how the killer always manages to keep up or ahead of his prey, why nothing ever seems to go right for the victims, how/why a killer chooses his target, how the killer creates a slow burn of fear for his prey and why slasher villains just keep coming back.
The main reason I think this sleeper is a hit? Nathan Baesel aka Leslie Mancuso aka Leslie Vernon.  He is charming, welcoming, funny and a methodically detailed killer.  I was really impressed with the way he handled the character, you come to like Leslie Vernon, but then you remember he is a psychotic killer…that is an interesting balance to strike and to play it as well as he does makes the movie that much more entertaining.  What would you know him from? Nothing really, other than a few one episode stints on all of your favorite primetime crime dramas he hasn’t done much.  I look forward to see what he has to offer in future roles.
Watch Behind the Mask, enjoy the multitude of slasher flick references and tributes and eat some candy!