The Queen of Versailles
The Queen of Versailles is a wonderful tale of the pursuit of excess. The story centers around billionaire Westgate resorts owner David Seigel and his wife Jackie. Their life overflows with money, children and tiny dogs. The two year period of the documentary focuses on the families financial burdens which accompany the crashing of the market. This is a film about people who desperately want to stay on their throne.
What make the doc interesting is Jackie Seigel. She has a warmth to her ditziness that creates a reliable narrator and interesting subject. For instance, when struggling financially she asks the clerk at a rental car company “who her driver was going to be.” Her life has been so opulent she has lost touch with reality. Watching her pull up at McDonalds in a stretch limo is a surreal site that she must love. Everything is big in her life. The former Miss Florida never wanted to settle. She earned a engineering degree and worked alongside the men until she couldn’t take it anymore. She tells a story about how one of her coworkers had a clock that counted down to his retirement. She asked why he had the clock and he replied “retirement is when I can start living my life.” She promptly quit her job and caught the eye of a twice married billionaire. Together, they produced seven kids and attempted to build the United States biggest private home. However, the market crashes and leaves an empty shell and reminder of fortunes lost.
Lining Jackie’s closets are $17,000 boots and so many outfits it takes a master bedroom to store them all. They plan on putting $5,000,000 dollars worth of marble in their new home and their skylight cost $250,000. it is wealth that wealthy people are envious of. However, when the market crashes they have massive property sales, marital strife and delusions of grandeur. There is a particularly sad scene where Jackie is shopping at Wal Mart and she fills ten carts full of unnecessary games and toys her kid’s will soon dismiss. The biggest fight between the married couple is that Jackie and her kids refuse to turn off all of the lights in their mansion. They have no concept of money and the reality of turning off lights to save money is foreign to them.
The film is frustrating to watch as the children have so many pets they often forget about them. This leads to stacks of poop and dead lizards that were never given water. They begin to realize they will have to do things on their own. It is like the current season of Downton Abbey but less British. Jackie admits that the only reason she had so many kids was because she had nannies to take care of them. However, you never dislike her. The directors were able to find a smart woman who because of her riches thought she never had to think again. She fought hard to become submissive and watching her adjust to reality is well worth the watch.
Share this post:
John’s Horror Corner: Superstition (1982)
http://hotdogcinema.wordpress.com/2012/02/19/superstition-1982-aka-the-witch/
Oh good. Another poster which misrepresents the movie.
MY CALL: Neither gem nor skipper, this is a typical 80s slasher movie. The kills are pretty random, the story is comically uninspired, and the actual murderous acts and the killer are never seen. [C-] IF LIKE THIS THEN WATCH: The Sleepaway Camp series (1983, 1988, 1989, 2008) provides uber-random kills and, in part 1, we don’t see the killer until the very last image still of the entire movie. It’s campy fun at its horrible best though. Other uber-random kills can be found in The Outing (1987). Equally crazy but better done and more interesting for the era were Deadly Blessing (1981) and The Sentinel (1977), and even the misdirected and awful The Nesting (1981) was better than this.
TAGLINE: “A witch put to death in 1692 swears vengeance on her persecutors and returns to the present day to punish their descendants.” [–IMDB]
This flick wastes none of your time. Before we’re 20 minutes into the running time a couple of pranksters intruding in the wrong abandoned house meet horror-humorous fates: a decapitated head exploding in a microwave and a killer window cuts a guy in half.
http://seriousexploitation.blogspot.com/2010/04/superstition-aka-witch-1982.html
http://hotdogcinema.wordpress.com/2012/02/19/superstition-1982-aka-the-witch/
Reverend David Thompson is approached by the police about this property, which has a bloody history. We learn from the weird caretaker lady that the killer is a “she.” But some crazy lady’s words aren’t sufficient evidence to keep the reverend from renting the house out to the family of a colleague of the cloth.
The kills are pretty random, almost comically uninspired, and the actual murderous act and the killer are never seen (just a black clawed hand), making this flick feels like most 80s slasher movies. Additional kills include a drowning, a rogue buzz saw blade to the chest, a hanging, crushing by giant vice, glass shrapnel to the face, hammering a stake through a forehead (my favorite in the movie!), and other random draggings by claw off camera.
http://hotdogcinema.wordpress.com/2012/02/19/superstition-1982-aka-the-witch/
Clearly a witch hand. Geez! Looks like this witch could palm a basketball!
The weird old caretaker lady is standoffish and uninformative as to what’s going on until Rev. David removes a crucifix from the pond out back. Evidently, removing the crucifix from the pond somehow empowers the killer and now he must perform some ritual. Why? Well, evidently the killer was a witch that was “drowned at the stake” (not a joke) back in 1692. It seems that she’s exacting her revenge on the descendants of her executioners and she waited about 300 years to do it. I guess it’s a good thing for that evil witch spirit that they didn’t just decide to move to Florida. Otherwise, she might have been waiting in that pond forever!
More people die, the story never really goes anywhere, and the last scene was the most painful of the entire movie. Despite this being advertised as something of a witch movie, it would be best to ignore that altogether and simply consider this another bad slasher flick with a supernatural component. There is really no reason this should be called “Superstition” either.
http://culttrailers.blogspot.com/2012/09/superstition-1982-aka-witch.html
Another bad title and cover that misrepresents the movie.
http://culttrailers.blogspot.com/2012/09/superstition-1982-aka-witch.html
Yet another awful title and cover that misrepresents the movie.
This flick should neither be skipped nor treated as a hidden gem. Chance it if you’re a horrid slasher fan who loves random flicks, don’t if you’re not.
Share this post:
John’s Horror Corner: The Outing (1987), and the attack of the evil giant Gremlin genie!
MY CALL: Eh, I guess I was entertained. Extremely random; occasionally funny. IF YOU LIKE THIS THEN WATCH: Wishmaster (1997) and sequels make much more sense of the evil genie and “be careful what you wish for” theme. Equally crazy but better done and more interesting for the era were Deadly Blessing (1981) and The Sentinel (1977), and even the misdirected and awful The Nesting (1981) was better than this. ALTERNATE TITLE: The Lamp, which makes waaaay more sense than The Outing. What was this “outing?” The school trip to the museum? Terrible titl
Some young criminals break into some old gypsy’s house, axe-murder the venerable homeowner as she’s trying to warn them away, and find a lamp dry-walled into the foundation. Immediately weird shit starts to happen. Not 10 minutes into the movie the axe-murdered gypsy axe-murders her axe-murderer with the murdering axe that is still embedded in her axe-murdered head. Then his buddy is cut in half by some animated ectoplasm and their slutty tagalong is air-strangled by an invisible force after sprinting naked through the house. [Best opening sequence in a bad horror EVER! Also, most use of axe-murder in one paragraph EVER!]
I later realized that my “gypsy” was an Arab. So the lamp and some of the Arab’s other effects are moved to a museum and we learn the lamp is 5500 years old! The lamp imprisons a Djinn (aka, Jinn or genie) and, during a high school field trip, some chick unleashes the Djinn and then plots with her friends to spend the night in the museum. Why do that? There is nothing cool or rebellious about spending a night in a museum.
Overnight some ridiculous stuff happens. A chick takes a bath (in a museum!) and is attacked by a coil of cobras, we just “find” her boyfriend with his body cut in half, a guy’s head is twisted around, random animated objects stab people on their own, a guy is bitten on the balls by a cobra, a Central American mummy goes zombie on someone…just totally random, unwarranted kills.
Speaking of random, this mummy was totally uncovered in the museum. Unless this is a children’s museum, I assure you someone’s kids are going to mess that thing up!
This is what happens if you feed a mogwai steroids after midnight.
When we finally see the animatronic genie it looks like a mix between the demons from The Gate (1987) and a giant Gremlin.
An anthropologist tries to fight it with a fire extinguisher, which doesn’t go well. Luckily, a 1987 computer program provides the answer of how to kill a genie. So they kill it. However, on a major error on the writer’s part, they discovered this “how to kill a genie program” while the genie was pretending to be the guy who found the program. So, evidently, the genie revealed how its enemies should kill it while it was hiding among them. WTF!?!
I’d skip this one. But if you insist, you’ll probably find a few laughs and perhaps the opening scenes are worth it on their own.
Whoa! Who’s up for a game of Dungeons & Dragons or HeroQuest? Okay. So I’m the old wizard on the left and I use my +1 magic lamp to defeat the lizard man and the medusa chick! BOOM! I just went up a level and gained a fire spell. Now chicks will dig me!
[below] looks like the cousin of the demon minotaur from Legend is hunting down teenagers.
Share this post:
Warm Bodies
When I started reading about Warm Bodies I was justifiably skeptical. A zombie falling in love with an attractive blond? The gimic felt like an attempt to capitalize on zombie lovers and tween audiences who devour undead supernatural romances. The skepticism disappearedwhen I saw the preview and liked how it incorporated humor, great music and a cheeky sense of humor. Director Jonathan Levine has created a funny, warm and engaging film about love and zombies that is a box office hit ($20 million opening weekend) and critical darling (77% Rotten Tomatoes).
When you walk out of Warm Bodies you will have a smile on your face and an appreciation of what the film pulled off. It juggled talking zombies, odd love, violent skeletons and Shakespearean (read John’s review) tragedy themes with comedic gusto. Most importantly you won’t be asking a plethora of questions. For instance, wouldn’t he smell? What happens to the bullet wounds? Why are the skeletons so angry? How did they find such perfect hoodies? The oddities of the film are not dwelled upon because when a movie is likable you can roll with it and ignore the inconsistencies that could weigh it down. They director knew he was telling a zombie love story and didn’t worry about how the main character was able to get electricity to his airplane.
Nicholas Hoult does a fine job as the zombified R. He has an interesting inner narration and a scene stealing best friend played by Rob Corddry. R meets Teresa Palmer’s character during a skirmish where he eats her boyfriend’s brains.While R is getting some brain food and receiving the dead man’s memories Palmer dives around a corner with a shotgun and kills several zombies in glorified slow motion He instantly falls in love and saves her from his flesh eating pals. He takes her to his airplane home and the two bond over music, corona and driving/crashing BMWs.
The rest of the film involves violent skeletons, John Malkovich being John Malkovich and several scene stealing moments for Rob Corddry and Analeigh Tipton (Crazy, Stupid, Love).
The script does have a paint by numbers feel (meet cute, bond, separate, reunite) but you will like the finished product the numbers lead to. Warm Bodies creates an unfamiliar story to a familiar trope. You become invested in the characters and genuinely care for their well being. The film was a gamble that paid off and I always appreciate that.
Watch Warm Bodies. Appreciate the zombie love story. Check out the playlist.
“Sitting In Limbo” – Jimmy Cliff
“Missing You” – John Waite
“The Bad In Each Other” – Feist
“Be The Song” – Foy Vance
“Patience” – Guns ‘N Roses
“Shell Suite” – Chad Valley
“Hungry Heart” – Bruce Springsteen
“Shelter From The Storm” – Bob Dylan
“Hinnom, TX” – Bon Iver
“Yamaha” – Delta Spirit
“Rock You Like A Hurricane” – Scorpions
“Oh Pretty Woman” – Roy Orbison
“Midnight City” – M83
“Runaway” – The National
“Numbers Don’t Lie” – The Mynabirds
Share this post:
The Inbetweeners
The Inbetweeners is incredibly raunchy but has a big heart. The teenagers in the film say some of the dirtiest things yet are loyal to a fault. It has been a fun ride watching the BBC television show and now seeing them getting a big send off. I’ve been watching these little punks embarrass themselves for a while and it is nice to see them grow up a little.
Following up on the popular BBC show The Inbetweeners movies follows up on the four guys as they graduate from high school and head to a Mediterranean hot spot to party. However, in true Inbetweener fashion they act gawky, get in trouble and mess up with the ladies constantly. The humor is sophmoric but delivered with so much glee it doesn’t push you away. For instance, at their cheap hotel they are charged $50 Euro if they crap on the floor and one of the guys takes home a woman that would give %90 of the population nightmares. They dance badly, puke on everything and one of them applies self tanner to his head and hands. The movie kicks off when they find themselves in the emptiest club on the beach. They meet four ladies and individually screw up with all of them. However, they are endearing little idiots (I mean that in the best way) and the ladies see that in them.
What I love about these guys is their friendship. They are not bad kids They are a bunch of squirrely little fellas whom have no social graces but always come through for each other. They may play many practical jokes but when one of them embarrasses themselves they all join in to make the hurt less. They have four distinct personalities that range from oblivious, content, boisterous and odd. They will all do something dumb (fall asleep in ant hills, drink too much, almost drown) and eventually atone themselves.
The movie sticks to the the regular conventions of the teen sex comedy. However, you like the characters and the motivations so it rises above the genre cliches and joins the ranks of likable raunchy comedies like Road Trip and Euro Trip. There is never any hateful comedy or mean spirited humor which makes it all the more enjoyable.
Watch the show on Netflix. Rent the film. Enjoy the idiots (I mean that in the best way).
Share this post:
Hansel and Gretel: Witch Hunters
Hansel and Gretel is a wonderful dumb machine. It is a Brother’s Grimm story on steroids that feels like a 100 minute film that was edited down to 80. The movie moves so fast you barely have time to catch your breath between witch decapitations.
Hansel and Gretel is the story of a good looking brother/sister duo who kill copious amounts of witches. They travel around the supernatural woods in search of death and pleathor pants. They help peasants rid themselves of swamp, bog, tree, water and sand witches that eat kids, enslave nice trolls and feed one of the heroes so much chocolate he becomes a diabetic.
What I like most about this bonkers film is it seems like another day in the life of these sibling badasses. They have a been there/done that attitude that is most likely the result of massive editing cuts. The witch they have to defeat in this episode is the grand witch Muriel played by Famke Janssen. She has an evil plan to raise a coven of warrior women who will wreak havoc on the peasant populace. She is thwarted of course and it happens quickly. Hansel and Gretel is a lean and mean killing machine that moves faster than one of Gretels arrows.
Jeremy Renner and Gemma Arterton are reliably good but are given nothing to do. They are believable butt kickers and have a nice chemistry despite all the editing and tinkering. What is left are one-liners, flirtations with good witches and wearing pleather pants well.
I understand why they signed on to this long delayed and strange film. It was directed/written by Tommy Wirkola who is best known for the fantastic Dead Snow. Snow featured a lovely infusion of blood and humor that created a perfect storm of zany horror. I’d wager the combination of a foreign director, studio meddling and scattershot script created the final product. They say a camel is a horse designed by committee. I think all the meddling of this horse created a manic honey badger. I bet the script was whittled down to the page the duo are looking at in the pic below.
Hansel and Gretel is short, fun and wonderful to watch. Is it good? Nope. Is it an odd little creature of destruction and quips? Yes. When it is over do you remember much of it. Nope? Does it feel like it was edited by a keyed up Shia LaBeouf? Yes. Will I watch it again? Absolutely!
Share this post:
John’s Old School Horror Corner: The Deadly Spawn (1983)
MY CALL: If you like cheap gore effects that make an effort and monster movies, I say see it! This is a fun flick and all of the filmmakers’ mistakes come off as funny. IF YOU LIKE THIS WATCH: Some other good, gory monster movies include The Abomination (1988), Leviathan (1989), The Kindred (1987), Night of the Creeps (1986), The Thing (1982; not The Thing 2011), and Slither (2006).
Wait a minute! I think I remember this from health class.
This is what happens when you don’t practice safe sex.
Much as in The Blob (1988) or Alien Predators (1985), a meteor (or…something…whatever) lands on Earth and brings with it horrible amorphous agents of gory death. Before we have any notion of a story we see a little of our anthropophagous extraterrestrials. They look like giant multi-headed worm Muppets loaded with teeth and two googly stalked claws. This abomination’s numerous larvae, which have infested the basement of a New Jersey home, are like little tadpole Alien chestbursters. Really kind of cute.
This is what happens when your dad finds out that you didn’t practice safe sex.
Our protagonists include a preteen monster movie enthusiast, a “science major” college kid and his college friends. These college kids get a hold of a dead larva and try to use their science knowledge to classify its placement in the animal kingdom, dissect it and look up what it is. One of them demands a college biology textbook so that he can solve this biological mystery–with a dead serious face! [My kids aren’t going to THAT kid’s college!] Meanwhile the preteen learns that the monster is blind but quite responsive to sound. While this may seem critical, the filmmakers somehow never made a big deal of this. While these kids try to academically sleuth the identity of these little abominations, the larvae spread from the basement “nest” and into neighbors’ homes and plumbing.
The gore is wonderful. Some serious effort was made for scenes involving tearing off and eating a woman’s face, and terrorizing a vegetarian group’s weekly pot luck.
So here’s the kid’s mom.
And here’s less of her.
I think this should happen to all vegetarians…
…and practitioners of Eastern medicine, herbalism and alternative remedies.
#LeechesRevenge
In the end the preteen single-handedly defeats the monster with a screwdriver, a sky pole, a Halloween mask and an extension cord in one of the most painfully drawn out monster kills in monster movie history. It’s like MacGuyver but without the awesome. The final scene is laughable, but it works given the budget and humor of the movie.
Monster angry at kid.
Monster even more angry with kid!
Monster angry at that house.
If you like gore and monster movies, I say see it! This is a fun flick and all of the filmmakers’ mistakes come off as funny.
Share this post:
Bad Movie Tuesday: Guns, Girls and Gambling
Non-linear, zippy dialogue and lots of guns. Watching Guns, Girls and Gambling is a like watching a dinosaur walk. It tries desperately to be Pulp Fiction but with none of the aspects that made Pulp Fiction good. It tries hard but has a fatal flaw. Everything is repeated over and over. Everyone experiences something then explains what just happened to other people. I’ve never witnessed anything like it before. The movie could have been 20 minutes long. The same jokes are repeated over and over. For instance, people are always being corrected for saying “midget” and “Indian.” The corrections probably occur 40 times. Another problem is that the obvious is always stated. like when a guy gets punched in the face Dane Cook’s sheriff says “Ouch, that must hurt.” Everybody states the obvious many times over. Then, they explain it again like the smirking female assassin who always shows up late and explains what just happened after somebody explained what just happened. It gets ridiculous.
Guns, Girls and Gambling has dialogue so zippy it kinda makes you scowl. I know I am repeating this but everything is repeated and then that assassin lady comes in and repeats it all again. She has no reason to be in the film for but for obvious reasons she gets a load of screen time. The worst part about her character is that she shoots people unnecessarily. Like she tells a guy to deliver a message and she shoots him. Or when fake Elvis says he knows nothing and she kills him. It is just not practical for an assassin. When you are wondering the practicality of an assassin the movie is doing something very wrong.
Along for the ride is Gary Oldman doing his best Elvis impersonation. He gets top billing but only seems to be doing a favor for Christian Slater. I love how he gets nominated for Oscars then appears in movies like this. Gary Oldman is up for anything and do can anything he wants. However, he ends up getting lit up by the female assassin and more stuff is repeated.
I’m thinking Christain Slater wanted to recreate the magic of True Romance. Slater is likable in this film and proves he can still anchor a film. However, he needs better material and new sunglasses.
The oddest inclusion is girl who is called The Girl Next Door who repeats everything Slater says. When they first meet about 30 minutes into the film Slater spends five minutes recapping the prior events so she can get caught up. Then, they get cornered by the female assassin and recap everything again. If this review sounds repetitive imagine how I felt watching the film.
I almost forgot Sheriff Dane Cook as a guy named Sheriff who is always one step behind and recapping everything that has happened after the assassin has already recapped everything.
I understand that writers (especially first time writers) love cheeky dialogue and quirky characters. The stuff they are saying is clever and shows off a verbal acumen. However, they need to realize that the reason Pulp Fiction, Usual Suspects, In Bruges are classics is because they move forward at full speed and ask the audiences to follow the ride. You do not want to miss one moment because you will be two steps behind. With GG&G you can step outside, eat a burger and come back in ten minutes and everything will be recapped for you. It is not clever when it spells everything out and names all of it’s characters Sheriff, Chief, Rancher, Pocahontas John Smith, Cowboy, Gay Elvis, Little Person Elvis, Deputy, Dark Eyes, Red Foot and The Blonde.
Watch the final ten minutes of this film because it will tell you everything that just happened. Of course, after those final ten minutes the Blond lady will come back and repeat everything.
Share this post:
John’s Horror Corner: Blood Beach (1980), the story of a beach that eats people and a flower monster.
MY CALL: This is basically a bad relationship movie that happens to have a sand monster in it. Just terrible! I would only recommend this to the most adventurous of bad horror connoisseurs. WHAT TO WATCH INSTEAD: Tremors (1990) or Humanoids from the Deep (1980).
In the opening scene an old lady is walking her dog on the beach and she is pulled into the sand by some “thing.” As she is pulled down screaming, before the release of Tremors (1990) by the way, her dog frantically barks for help. A cat would have just watched her with contempt. I’m just saying dogs are better pets in horror movies, that’s all. Moving on…
With the help of her ex-boyfriend, beach patrol man Harry, Catherine investigates her mother’s disappearance. It’s been a while and there’s still a spark there, but Harry is involved with someone else. Luckily his girlfriend is eaten by the beach and he can devote his energy to Catherine, who he just learned is getting a divorce from her husband.
While this patrol man succumbed to the beach’s appetite, sadly his hairstyle persisted throughout much of the 80s.
After racking up a decapitated dog, a mutilated woman and a castrated rapist, police captain Pearson (John Saxon; John Saxon; A Nightmare on Elm Street, Black Christmas, Tenebre) and Sgt. Royko (Burt Young; the Rocky series; Amityville II) are entertaining sea monster theories from their police scientist (Stefan Gierasch; Carrie, Spellbinder), who presents some pretty radical evolutionary theories about moving from sea to land and “learning to walk” considering he’s never seen a specimen and his theories grow more insane later in the movie.
Here’s something that goes completely unexplained. For whatever reason, the beach regurgitates this mostly dead guy.
I’m guessing they put all the blood into the title because there is almost no blood in Blood Beach. The gore isn’t the only aspect of the movie that falls short. The acting is weak (but that should come as no surprise), it drags along and the deaths are unexciting. In fact, nothing about this movie was exciting. People are being forcefully dragged to their doom and I’m watching waiting for something cool to happen…that should be the cool thing!!!! Yet the victems behave like they’re in quicksand. And WAY too much attention is paid to Harry and Catherine’s relationship, which is also painfully boring and got a LOT of screentime. The most damning thing is that this movie featured the least exciting violent penis amputation in the history of film! Such a scene typically comes with a wince, a gasp or even laughter (e.g., Piranha 3D and Piranha 3DD).
Worst castration scene EVER!
In the end they find the monster’s lair and we see the beast. What a disappointment. It’s like an evil sunflower with a veiny scrotum for a body. Monster-FAIL!
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!! A slimy, STD-ridden flower.
John Saxon was the only good thing about this movie.
Share this post:
10 Years
10 Years wisely doesn’t have the melodramatic bells and whistles that normally go along with good looking people attending a reunion. The laid back script and likable cast create a neat little film that should find an audience on DVD. It constantly hits for singles as opposed to swinging for the fences. The result are moments that make the experience worthwhile. I enjoyed watching an unpretentious film that didn’t have emotional monologues or that slacker guy who is overly self important. However, because of it’s adherence to staying below the radar keeps it from being memorable like other reunion films Beautiful Girls or Gross Pointe Blank.
10 Years tells the simple story about a high school reunion and the various characters who come to it. The cast is loaded with likable good looking actors who genuinely seem to enjoy being part of this film. Together, they drink a lot, sing bad karaoke and discover hidden break dancing skills.
As the night progresses old feelings reemerge, tiny revelations are made and people begin to realize that they should grow up. It also features a neat song by Oscar Issac.
I’ve always been a sucker for reunion movies. I love Gross Pointe Blank and Beautiful Girls. However, I was too young to fully appreciate the intricacies of the 27-28 year old brain when I was 14. So, 10 Years is sorta my generations reunion movie. It never dives below the surface but intelligently stays away from melodrama. There is no extravagant adultery plot, broken hearts, tear soaked monologues or fist fights. Channing Tatum doesn’t chase his girlfriend to the airport and after these two get caught throwing toilet paper they say “it seemed like a good idea a couple hours ago.”
It doesn’t explore deeper territory like the fantastic reunion film Beautiful Girls. Beautiful asks “Why do we always f*ck up with the good ones?” It is about the unrealistc expectations men have and the relationships those expectations keep them from having. The movie had more time to dive into the territory and featured contemplation of waiting for a 13 year old to turn 18. The waiting never happens and cooler heads prevail. In the end the film has memorable themes and relevant questions.
You won’t ask yourself questions while watching 10 Years. However, you will enjoy the resolution of several story lines For instance, Justin Long, Max Minghella and Lynn Collins have a touching conclusion. Also, Oscar Issac and Kate Mara form a nice duo whose chemistry and back story can connect with most people who harbored a secret high school crush.
10 Years is a nice film that shows how much things change over ten years. The cast is likable and there are moments that stick. It is refreshing to watch a nice film about nice people who are growing up.
Movies, Films & Flix 
