You can download the pod on Apple Podcasts, Stitcher, Tune In, Podbean, or Spreaker.
If you get a chance please make sure to review, rate and share. You are awesome!
The MFF podcast is back, and this week we’re finishing up our “Hacker” series with the 1985 comedy Real Genius. We started with Live Free or Die Hard, then tackled Hackers, now we’re talking about the Martha Coolidge (Valley Girl) directed Real Genius. We love this movie because of the likable Characters (Viva la Chris Knight), government funded laser commercials, and an all-time jerky performance by William Atherton. In this episode, you will hear us talk about popcorn, ice skating and the awesomeness of Val Kilmer. Enjoy!
If you are a fan of the podcast make sure to send in some random listener questions so we can do our best to not answer them correctly. We thank you for listening and hope you enjoy the pod!
You can download the pod on Apple Podcasts, Stitcher, Tune In, Podbean,or Spreaker.
If you get a chance please make sure to review, rate and share. You are awesome!
Share this post:
MY CALL: This film heavily derivative, borrowing a lot from The Walking Dead (2010-2019), I Am Legend (2007) and The Descent (2005). But I don’t really care. This film makes a great effort, it’s a decent movie, and it has a lot of heart. Derivative, but determined. MORE MOVIES LIKE Extinction: For more engaging apocalyptic Sci-Horror, try I Am Legend (2007), The Colony (2013), World War Z (2013), The Day (2011), 10 Cloverfield Lane (2016), The Mist (2007), A Quiet Place (2018), Bird Box (2018) and The Happening (2008).
The near future is bleak and filled with highly contagious sprinting raging ghouls with a propensity for flesh-tearing neck bites—as is so often the case, right? After nearly a decade of no outside human contact, Patrick (Matthew Fox; Lost, Bone Tomahawk), Jack (Jeffrey Donovan; Book of Shadows: Blair Witch 2) and young daughter Lu (Quinn McColgan) confirm they’re not alone after a sighting of the zombie-vampire creature that ended the world they once knew.
Albino, blind, generally naked flesh eat-eaters, our monsters push the creatures from The Descent (2005) above ground into I Am Legend (2007) territory. The violent action, blood and gore, and monster make-up are all good. Nothing here is original, but it’s certainly well done.
Director Miguel Ángel Vivas (Inside, Kidnapped) has brought us his own take on the end of the world. And as we’ve seen in The Walking Dead (2010-2019), I Am Legend (2007) and many others of the motif, going unnoticed to the non-human threat, seeking survivors across radio waves, and foraging for food become the main themes. The best filmmaking decision (for me) was the Winter setting, which added a crisply barren palate and a great deal of flavor to Fox and Donovan’s solid performances.
But what’s with these blind predators? Pitch Black (2000), A Quiet Place (2018), The Silence (2019), The Descent (2005), Tremors (1990)… sometimes subterranean evolution is a good reason, but that doesn’t at all apply in the present film. I’m guessing Miguel Ángel Vivas just loved The Descent (2005), as the present ghouls feel strikingly similar to them.
You know what? This film heavily derivative, borrowing a lot from many well-known sources (especially TWD season 3 in one particular scene). But I don’t really care. This film still makes a significant and appreciable effort, it’s a decent movie, and it has a lot of heart. Derivative, but determined.
Share this post:
MY CALL: This B-movie movie isn’t particularly good or bad—very middle of the road. If you’re patient with weak special effects backed by an enthusiastic filmmaker, then it’s serviceable. The more of a “bad movie night” you desire, the better this will serve you. MORE MOVIES LIKE Mutant: For more alternative zombie movies, try The Curse (1987), Flesh-Eating Mothers (1988), The Boneyard (1991) and Zombeavers (2015).
At the start of their vacation, two entitled popped-collar brothers have a rough car-crashing encounter with the hillbilly locals. Now injured and without a car, Josh (Wings Hauser; Tales from the Hood, Watchers III) and Mike (Lee Montgomery; Ben) are stuck in a small southern town where businesses are closing, half the town is sick, and people are disappearing. Even Mike disappears their first night there!
As Josh goes about searching for his brother, more strange things occur. There’s a break-in at the local doctor’s office stealing all the blood, a child with leech-like mouth-slivers on her hands is found dead, and folks infected with something behave like zombies! These zombies have terrible make-up, their skin pulsates a little (not an impressive effect, at all), and they are hungry for blood. And what’s to blame? Toxic waste!
Like so many bad horror movies before, the local doctor (or scientist in some movies; e. g., The Nest, Mimic) seems to be an expert of numerous fields including genetics, invertebrate biology, microbiology and hematology. The alcoholic sheriff (Bo Hopkins; Dusk Till Dawn II, Tentacles, Phantoms) and a cute school teacher also come to Josh’s aid.
This movie opened with some guy using a dropper to collect some oozy discharge milky goo from the lawn of an old McMansion estate. This goop gets a lot of attention, it oozes from these zombies’ hands, and like The Toxic Avenger (1984) contact with these mutant zombies burns the flesh.
We see some madcap hammed-up zombie acting. These mutants roar like dinosaurs and come at you with their hands in the air as if a 7-year-old was doing his best monster impression. It was especially amusing when the bald redneck zombie breaks “zombie character” to catch a falling fellow zombie (after he’s shot). I’m also not sure why they’re so slow in most scenes, when we saw a zombie sprint earlier in the movie like a 28 Days Later (2002) rage zombie way ahead of his time. But, to be fair, these are really minor criticisms given that these mutant zombies drink blood through their palm-vaginas. Yes, that statement is hardly an exaggeration!
This movie isn’t particularly good or bad—very middle of the road. If you’re patient with weak special effects backed by the enthusiastic filmmaker director John ‘Bud’ Cardos (Kingdom of the Spiders, The Dark, The Day Time Ended), then it’s serviceable… maybe. The more of a “bad movie night” you desire, the better this will serve you.
Share this post:
MY CALL: This was a laughably bad movie loaded with nudity but not overly raunchy, and it at least makes an effort with the creature effects and horror/attack scenes. Still, I wouldn’t dare recommend it. MORE MOVIES LIKE Evil Spawn: For more smutty Sci-Horror B-movies, try Biohazard (1985), Evils of the Night (1985) and Creepazoids (1987).
After a Venus probe returns to Earth loaded with alien microbes, researchers dutifully perform unethical research splicing the DNA of alien microbial organisms and humans. This feels oddly similar to the premise of Species (1995)…
This 70-minute Fred Olen Ray (Biohazard, Deep Space, Scalps) DVD was, like a SkineMax midnight movie, introduced by Ray himself and what I believe to be several adult film actresses showing more skin in the five-minute intro than you’d normally get in an entire movie. Clearly, I’m in for something much more smutty than I had anticipated.
Thankfully, in the opening scene of the actual film we see a B-movie monster (a spider-rat hybrid thing) attacking some poor scientist. The execution is super-clunky. But God bless them, they really tried and showed us a lot of the creature. However cheap a movie may be, I can appreciate that.
The nefarious researcher Evelyn (Dawn Wildsmith, or Donna Shock; Hollywood Chainsaw Hookers, Deep Space, Evils of the Night) works with Dr. Zeitman (John Carradine; Evils of the Night, The Nesting, The Howling, The Sentinel) on anti-aging research. Evelyn approaches a gorgeous but aging actress Lynn (Bobbie Bresee; Mausoleum, Surf Nazis Must Die, Ghoulies) with a proposal to prolong her youth and beauty. Desperate to earn more starring roles, she takes the serum.
Once infected, people react differently. One becomes a sore-covered ghoul with the strength to rip an arm from its blood-spewing socket. And Lynn, when threatened a la Species (1995), turns into a ridiculous, rubber-suited insectoid monster. Another of her transformations assumes the likeness of a gnarly Predator (1987)-meets-Demons (1985) make-up job that is far more entertaining before she “weres” into the monster suit form that is beginning to remind me of Brundlefly from The Fly (1986). The special effects are more than serviceable for B-movie fans. But on the scales of decency, the effects are definitely outweighed by boobage. There are striptease and sex scenes, shower scenes, skinny-dipping and just plain standing around topless scenes. Every opportunity to show breasts was readily presented.
The closest thing to a hero in this schlocky movie is Lynn’s biographer Ross (Drew Godderis; Cannibal Hookers, Blood Diner, Deep Space), who takes a break from writing her memoirs to try to save her from vanity-induced murderous space-mania and notify the public of the threat.
All told, this was a laughably bad movie loaded with nudity but not overly raunchy, and it at least makes an effort with the creature effects and number of horror scenes. Still, I wouldn’t dare recommend it.
Share this post:
John’s Horror Corner: Child’s Play (1988), the classic evil doll movie introducing us to Chucky and Brad Dourif’s menace!
MY CALL: This is a classic that holds up splendidly due to great filmmaking, thoughtfully written characters, and enduring practical special effects. Strongest recommendations whether you want an 80s classic or a quintessential killer doll film. MOVIES LIKE Child’s Play: The other Chucky movies most worth watching are Child’s Play 2 (1990), and then I might skip all the way to Curse of Chucky (2013) and Cult of Chucky (2017)—not that I didn’t enjoy them all to some degree. There is also the excellent remake of Child’s Play (2019). Other quality evil doll films include The Boy (2016), Annabelle: Creation (2017), Dolly Dearest (1991), Dolls (1987) and Puppet Master (1989).
Detective Norris (Chris Sarandon; Fright Night, The Resurrected, The Sentinel) is in pursuit of serial killer Charles Lee Ray (Brad Dourif; The Hazing, Dune, Curse of Chucky, Cult of Chucky) who, in a striking cinematic scene of 80s horror, desperately invokes black magic to pass his soul into a vessel before he succumbs to his gunshot wounds. That vessel: a Good Guy doll in a toy store.
Before in an era when a talking doll could wow children across the world and kids had outfits to match their them, single mother Karen (Catherine Hicks; Turbulence) gives her 6-year-old son Andy (Alex Vincent; Curse of Chucky, Cult of Chucky, Child’s Play 2) one such sought-after doll for his birthday… but they ended up with a serious product defect!
Director Tom Holland (Fright Night, Tales from the Crypt, Thinner, The Temp) is masterful at staging his scenes with his love of filmmaking eclipsing his love of horror. When Andy is woefully disappointed by the absence of a Good Guy doll among his gifts, Karen’s response feels as sincere and credibly humbling as the plights I grew up experiencing with a single low-income mother. The characters all feel significant, and even the minor roles feel fleshed out and lived-in characters (e.g., Karen’s boss at the department store and the hobo who sells Karen the Good Guy). Also, the child actor (as Andy) was great. He carried his scenes well, and adorably!
Demonstrating a tactful restraint before revealing Chucky, this movie toys with our nerves. Not until halfway through the film do we hear Chucky’s real voice or see him moving autonomously on-screen. We watch apprehensively as Karen looks under the couch for the doll, poking Chucky to see if he responds. We encounter the classic doll movie tells—but, to be fair, these are probably tropes solidified by this film. The doll never seems to be where people left it, Andy is blamed for the actions of the doll, the doll appears in strange places, Andy leans in as if Chucky is whispering to him and then says something no 6-year-old would say, mischievous POV shots scrambling down the hallway, and young Andy suggests that Chucky can move on his own. And the result is the sort of plain old-fashioned malevolence that would make homicidal dolls menacing for generations to come (along with the Twilight Zone’s Talking Tina).
Chucky is mentally askew, a true psychopath, and his facial expressions are rich with depth. Brad Dourif’s growling screams imbue Chucky with a menace few actors could or would even dare to attempt, and it has brought fame to both franchise and actor alike. But menace isn’t all that characterizes Chucky, but entropic madness. And Chucky is just plain mean. He delights in torturing people, whether with voodoo doll limb-breaking or slow electrocution.
Devoid of the overly sleek movements of a modern CGI monster, Chucky moves with the awkward and rigid locomotory clumsiness that an animated doll might actually have—lacking proper articulating tendons and joints. When Chucky attacks Karen (by the fireplace) and Norris (in the car) his movements have the erratic quality of a murderous round of Whack-a-Mole.
Chucky becomes more human the longer he spends in his doll vessel, and to avoid being trapped as a doll-man forever, he must find a living vessel. Not only does Chucky keep the wounds he has incurred, but he even eerily looks more human later in the film and his expressions become jarring, even terrifying.
The pacing of the film feels strong throughout. When Andy lights Chucky on fire we get the most powerful use of the “friends ‘til the end” line. And then, with his horrifically charred still-smoking melty-plastic body, Chucky lumbers forth as he is shot to actual pieces in a wonderful finale.
This film is unrelenting when it comes to piling on just one more shock to a scene, and the performances match the excitement of the action. This is one of those films that holds up splendidly over time due to great filmmaking, thoughtful writing, and enduring practical special effects. Strongest recommendations.
Share this post:
You can download the pod on Apple Podcasts, Stitcher, Tune In, Podbean, or Spreaker.
If you get a chance please make sure to review, rate and share. You are awesome!
The MFF podcast is back, and this week we’re talking about the 1997 cult classic Cube. We here at MFF love Cube, because of its inventive set design, fun script and creation of an incredibly expensive death trap. In this episode, we talk about farms in Montana, Third-Eye Blind and how this movie was able to look so great on a very low budget. If you are a fan of Cube, you will love this episode.
If you are a fan of the podcast make sure to send in some random listener questions so we can do our best to not answer them correctly. We thank you for listening and hope you enjoy the pod!
You can download the pod on Apple Podcasts, Stitcher, Tune In, Podbean,or Spreaker.
If you get a chance please make sure to review, rate and share. You are awesome!
Share this post:
John’s Horror Corner: Child’s Play (2019), the fun reboot of the 1988 classic evil doll franchise that we deserve!
MY CALL: This is so much better than we deserve in an era saturated with phoned-in remakes. I loved it. And if you’re worried about the new approach to Chucky’s psychopathy—stop worrying and just give it a chance. MOVIES LIKE Child’s Play: The other Chucky movies most worth watching are Child’s Play (1988), Child’s Play 2 (1990), and then I might skip all the way to Curse of Chucky (2013) and Cult of Chucky (2017)—not that I didn’t enjoy them all to some degree. Other quality evil doll films include The Boy (2016), Annabelle: Creation (2017), Dolly Dearest (1991), Dolls (1987) and Puppet Master (1989).
Director Lars Klevberg (Polaroid) steps up to helm the 8th Child’s Play feature film to reboot the 7-film run that stemmed from Tom Holland’s (Fright Night, Tales from the Crypt, Thinner, The Temp) magnificent original. Now 30 years later, our Good Guy doll has advanced along with our technology and, for the sake of edgier content, we’ve also made Andy a bit older.
Young Andy from 1988
Karen (Aubrey Plaza; Life After Beth, Legion) gives her 13-year-old son (Gabriel Bateman; Annabelle, Lights Out) a Buddi doll for his birthday, only to discover this doll has a few… manufacturer defects.
The Buddi doll is like a SmartHub meets Siri crossed by BlueTooth and basic artificial intelligence to make daily life easier for all members of the family. And to make Buddi more contemporized, we’ve removed the voodoo possession of the 80s serial killer and made him the product of a disgruntled employee in an abusive Vietnamese factory workplace who removes all safety protocols from the doll’s programming. Yup, we’ve removed Asimov’s laws of robotics (i.e., really laws of AI ethics) to not harm humans and the like. Dear lord… it’s like SkyNet just went live in your own home in the form of a smiling doll with an eerily friendly disposition. And what voice actor could better stand up to the legendary Brad Dourif (The Hazing, Dune, Curse of Chucky, Cult of Chucky) but Mark Hamill (The Dark Crystal: Age of Resistance)? Watching Chucky learn was kind of cute—in that troped-up naïve-to-the-world way.
Also a big jump from the other movies is that this Chucky doll walks around as part of its normal product function. So being seen moving on its own isn’t a red flag for a killer doll anymore. It brings about a more feisty than malevolent tone at first. Another big change is that this Chucky’s murderous behavior originally stems from good intentions. Sure he strangles a cat… but he thought he was protecting Andy. Chucky is kind of sweet, so we feel badly when he violently errs. But when Chucky sees Andy and friends laughing at the murderous gore of The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 (1986) on TV… that’s when we know Chucky is taking a dark turn. Chucky goes from sympathetic to way creepy on a frighteningly credible trajectory.
The plot-point writing is a bit clunky (e.g., it took me half the movie to figure out if Plaza’s boyfriend lived with them or not), but the execution still lands entertainingly well, especially when delivered with Aubrey Plaza’s lines or her great interactions with Gabriel Bateman. Their mother-son dynamic feels sincere, congenial, and credibly contemporary. And their neighbor’s friendly son, Detective Norris (Brian Tyree Henry; Hotel Artemis, Godzilla vs Kong), brings poorly-dialogued yet still pleasant levity.
And blood…? Yup, there’s a lot of that. The double through-the-skin leg break scene was gleefully shocking with some mean imagery, a soil tiller rips up a guy’s head, a fleshy face is removed from its skull for decorative effect, there’s a sloppy buzzsaw to the crotch (we see it coming, but it’s really fun), blood gushes into people’s faces and, of course, lots of stabbing. The violence is messy, the death scenes will please gore-hounds, and a lot of humor is delivered with the violence and horror.
In tone, this film finds a middle ground in the franchise. It’s not as zany as Bride of- or Seed of- or Cult of Chucky (2017), it’s definitely not as mean-spirited as its predecessors either, but there is less “restraint” or mystique than in Child’s Play (1988) or Curse of Chucky (2013). The key word for this movie is “fun.” We laugh and smile and giggle frequently. I’d call it the Final Destination 5 (2011) of the Chucky brand.
The direction was really impressive and cultivated high-level thrill-ride shock value to the attacks, scares and violence. This movie is way more impressive than I expected and maybe even more than it deserved to be. I feared that an AI Chucky doll (as opposed to possessed by a psychopath) would be a dull modernization playing on color-by-numbers tropes. However, I don’t think I disliked anything about this. Rather… I kind of loved this! Please make a sequel.
REMAKE/REIMAGINING SIDEBAR: For more horror remakes, I strongly favor the following: Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1978), An American Werewolf in London (1981), The Thing (1982), The Fly (1986), The Mummy (1999), The Ring (2002), The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (2003), The Hills Have Eyes (2006), Friday the 13th (2009), Let Me In (2010), Evil Dead (2013), Carrie (2013), The Town That Dreaded Sundown (2014), It (2017) and Suspiria (2018). Those to avoid include The Thing (2011; a prequel/remake), Poltergeist (2015), Cabin Fever (2016), A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010), Night of the Demons (2009), Body Snatchers (1993; the second remake), The Invasion (2007; the third remake), War of the Worlds (2005) and The Mummy (2017). I’m on the fence about An American Werewolf in Paris (1997), Halloween (2007), It’s Alive (2009), My Bloody Valentine (2009), Fright Night (2011), Maniac (2012) and Pet Sematary (2019), which range from bad to so-so (as remakes in my opinion) but still are entertaining movies on their own.
Share this post:
John’s Horror Corner: Maniac (2012), a brutal remake of a slasher classic, and starring Elijah Wood.
MY CALL: Clearly this was an ambitious and stylized approach to this remake. And whereas it impressed me in many ways it lacks the lasting impact of the 1980 original. Still a solid film and a great watch for fans of brutal cinema. MORE MOVIES LIKE Maniac: The original Maniac (1980) and, for its stylish nature, The Neon Demon (2016).
Our killer Frank (Elijah Wood; The Good Son, The Faculty, Cooties) lives in a mannequin shop (sort of) and connects with photographer Anna (Nora Arnezeder; Zoo, Origin, Berserk, Safe House), to whom he takes an instant interest.
As someone who loved the 1980 original so much, I have procrastinated watching this remake for nearly a decade. But despite my hesitation, I wanted to give it the benefit of the doubt because of Elijah Wood’s passionate involvement. So now, finally succumbing, director Franck Khalfoun’s (Amityville: The Awakening, Prey, P2) remake brings some welcome upgrades. Most notably was the opening sequence, which culminated in the iconic scalping of the first victim. And while it felt a bit romanticized in execution, it was slick and gruesome and everything I didn’t realize that I wanted.
This remake feels veeeeery stylized, much more sexualized and almost psychedelic at times. With a flavor and approach that are certainly different, I wouldn’t dare call it better than the original in execution. But nice that it doesn’t simply try to rehash or recreate it, one iconic scene after the next. Some aspects work well, others just okay. For example, the imagery and accompanying sound effects of the scalpings are truly visceral. But I find Frank’s POV-shots to often feel out of place…. well, some of the time. On a date fooling around with his online site match it feels disruptive to the pace (for me), but when he’s applying his sloppy scalp trophies to his mannequins while talking to them it feels perfectly disconcertingly appropriate. And the nudity in this remake felt far more outright gratuitous rather than contributing to vulnerability (as it often did well in the original). There was certainly nothing “vulnerable” about the raunchy flashbacks of Frank’s mother (America Olivo; Bitch Slap, Neighbor, Friday the 13th).
Great efforts were made to keep this remake shocking. And shocking us was its greatest strength. The Achilles tendon slice was mean and abrupt! I yelled at my TV when it happened. One of the scalpings brutally tears the scalp from a still living victim—vicious! However, I feel that when it came to Frank’s deeper connection with Anna and our psychological understanding of our killer, 1980 simply did it better… way better. In 1980 Anna was a very strong character, and Frank was palpably tortured in the confines of his own head atop a body littered in burns and scars connecting the dots of his past abuse. 2012 missed those marks, but definitely brought its A-game for Frank’s comeuppance in the brutal, skin-peeling finale.
The real highlight here is the heart Elijah Wood poured into this beloved cinematic killer. His facial expressions seize mental disturbance and do honor to Joe Spinell’s (Starcrash, The Last Horror Film, Maniac) on-screen mania. And yes, this film is brutal and mean and shocking—and I enjoy that. I enjoyed the movie. But my overall reaction and satisfaction were greater with the original.
REMAKE/REIMAGINING SIDEBAR: For more horror remakes, I strongly favor the following: Invasion of the Body Snatchers (1978), An American Werewolf in London (1981), The Thing (1982), The Fly (1986), The Mummy (1999), The Ring (2002), The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (2003), The Hills Have Eyes (2006), Friday the 13th (2009), Let Me In (2010), Evil Dead (2013), Carrie (2013), The Town That Dreaded Sundown (2014), It (2017) and Suspiria (2018). Those to avoid include The Thing (2011; a prequel/remake), Poltergeist (2015), Cabin Fever (2016), A Nightmare on Elm Street (2010), Night of the Demons (2009), Body Snatchers (1993; the second remake), The Invasion (2007; the third remake), War of the Worlds (2005) and The Mummy (2017). I’m on the fence about An American Werewolf in Paris (1997), Halloween (2007), It’s Alive (2009), My Bloody Valentine (2009), Fright Night (2011) and Pet Sematary (2019), which range from bad to so-so (as remakes in my opinion) but still are entertaining movies on their own.
Share this post:
Bad Movie Tuesday: Leatherface: Texas Chainsaw Massacre III (1990), squandering the strong final girl and slapstick bonkers violent legacy of part 2 (1986).
MY CALL: This sequel was so… incredibly… not good at all. I mean, what did you like about either of the first two Texas Chainsaw movies? Doesn’t matter. Nothing you liked will be found here. MORE MOVIES MUCH BETTER THAN Texas Chainsaw Massacre III: Well obviously you should have already seen The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974) and the ultra-zany sequel The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 (1986). From there I’d suggest seeing The Funhouse (1981), Motel Hell (1980) and House of 1000 Corpses (2003) before moving on to the much better The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (2003), The Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning (2006) and perhaps Texas Chainsaw 3-D (2013).
FRANCHISE SIDEBAR: In 1974, a group of twentysomethings basically got really unlikely and stumbled across the wrong house of homicidal cannibals. After a narrated introduction linking our story to The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974) and explaining the aftermath of final girl Sally (now deceased), The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 (1986) waded into waters far more gory and campy than anything in 1974 (which was hopelessly desperate and dire). But apparently nothing from part 2 matters in part III… except for the presence of grandpa Sawyer, perhaps.
Driving from California to Florida, young couple Michelle (Kate Hodge; She-Wolf of London, The Hidden II, Silk Stalkings) and Ryan (William Butler; Ghoulies II, Friday the 13th part VII, Watchers III) find themselves in Podunk, Texas. Naturally, the gas station attendant is a perverted lunatic and a local hitchhiker (Viggo Mortensen; The Prophecy) distracts the murderous local as the couple escape down some backroads that don’t appear on their maps.
While being hunted down by local crazies Leatherface and Tinker (Joe Unger; A Nightmare on Elm Street, Pumpkinhead II) and Alfredo (Tom Everett; Friday the 13th: The Final Chapter), a well-armed passerby motorist Benny (Ken Foree; Dawn of the Dead, Death Spa) comes to their aid to battle this sick family of cannibals.
Following up Tobe Hooper’s (Lifeforce, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 1-2, Poltergeist, The Funhouse) first two films, director Jeff Burr (Puppet Master 4-5, Pumpkinhead II, Puppet Master: Blitzkrieg Massacre) seems simply to have made a nasty slasher flick—nothing more. And it’s a movie quickly forgotten for its complete lack of merits.
Even by its opening on-screen narration, this seems more to be a sequel to The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974) than to The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 (1986). And in the opening credits Leatherface, now played by a third actor (R.A. Mihailoff; Hatchet II, Smothered, Pumpkinhead II) in as many movies, feels more like a big goon with some sick murderous habits rather than the monstrous man-child we came to know in the previous two films.
LEATHERFACE: In The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 (1986), Leatherface (Bill Johnson) has a slapstick yet macabre vibe about him as he chainsaws a moving vehicle while wearing an entire dead shambling corpse as a disguise. He’s extremely sexually repressed and highly foolish. This graduated him from The Texas Chainsaw Massacre (1974), in which is he more simply a hulking brute of a man-child taking orders from all others in his family. Now in part III, he has yet a third and completely different personality. What gives? At least I could see 1974 Leatherface growing into 1986’s.
This sequel seems to have defanged Leatherface of his off-kilter mystique and preternatural menace. He’s just a kinda’ big mean dude with a chainsaw who likes killing people now. I realize that Ken Foree is a big dude, but he makes Leatherface seems like a random but formidable punk in a bar brawl instead of some flesh-eating monster. Never has this iconic psychopath felt so neutered before in my eyes than in this anemic sequel. Worse yet, the violence is mostly off-screen, so we’ve traded some lame splattered blood for chainsaw gore of yore.
And what the heck was going on with the floating/motorboating chainsaw in the swamp water? And did Leatherface just get haphazardly killed by a swamp rock? Really, movie? Really?
Terrible dialogue, the violence doesn’t strike any chords, little is shocking (which is nearly unforgivable after the previous two films), lame final girl who’s trying and failing to capture the crazy of Caroline Williams (Leprechaun 3, Halloween II, Hatchet III, Contracted), very few and basic sets… it’s really kind of… boring. This feels like a weak attempt at continuing the The Texas Chainsaw Massacre 2 (1986) lunacy. An attempt, but not very convincing so—not even close. We have a grandpa Sawyer cadaver at the dinner table, a murderous extended family ready to butcher unlucky motorists, and Leatherface swinging his chainsaw around like a sword. But none of that produced any redeeming or memorable scenes. Really, movie—what happened?
There is yet another sequel… In the end, Benny and Michelle live, and in the last scene we see so did Leatherface. Watch out for Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Next Generation (1994).
This sequel was so… incredibly… not good at all. I mean, what did you like about either of the first two Texas Chainsaw movies? Doesn’t matter. Nothing you liked will be found here. I think this movie is garbage, it should even be skipped by fans of the franchise, and I now see how I didn’t remember anything at all from the first time I saw this in the 90s.
Share this post:
The Movies, Films and Flix Podcast #218: Anaconda and Jon Voight’s Insane Paraguayan Accent
You can download the pod on Apple Podcasts, Stitcher, Tune In, Podbean, or Spreaker.
If you get a chance please make sure to review, rate and share. You are awesome!
The MFF podcast is back, and this week we’re talking about the incredible 1997 creature feature Anaconda. We love this movie, and think Jon Voight was robbed of an Academy Award nomination. Why? Between the insane accent, constant scowl and physical menace, it might be the most “I’m going to do whatever I want’ performance of recent memory. In this episode, you will hear us talk about salad, terrible sound guys and very strong snakes. You will love it!
If you are a fan of the podcast make sure to send in some random listener questions so we can do our best to not answer them correctly. We thank you for listening and hope you enjoy the pod!
You can download the pod on Apple Podcasts, Stitcher, Tune In, Podbean,or Spreaker.
If you get a chance please make sure to review, rate and share. You are awesome!
Movies, Films & Flix 